PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBCB vs. MBBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBCB vs. MBBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB) and VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBCB achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly higher than MBBB's 0.43% return.


BBCB

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.66%
YTD
2.82%
6M
2.66%
1Y
8.37%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*

MBBB

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.32%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBCB vs. MBBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BBCB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
2.82%7.69%1.97%8.42%-15.72%-2.23%1.56%
MBBB
VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF
0.43%7.64%3.68%9.75%-15.04%0.30%1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BBCB and MBBB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020

0.97

The correlation between BBCB and MBBB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBCB vs. MBBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBCB
BBCB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBCB Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MBBB
MBBB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBCB vs. MBBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB) and VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBCBMBBBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

1.31

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.79

1.92

+0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.23

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.82

+1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.09

5.86

+4.22

BBCB vs. MBBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the MBBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBCB and MBBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBCBMBBBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

1.31

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.18

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.18

+0.27

Drawdowns

BBCB vs. MBBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBCB drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, roughly equal to the maximum MBBB drawdown of -21.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCB and MBBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBCBMBBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.48%

-21.73%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

-2.98%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.46%

-5.64%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.32%

-21.73%

-0.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.97%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.66%

-6.83%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.92%

-0.09%

Volatility

BBCB vs. MBBB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB) is 1.41%, while VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) has a volatility of 1.52%. This indicates that BBCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBCBMBBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

1.52%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.98%

3.15%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.93%

4.14%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.25%

6.36%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.50%

6.23%

+1.27%

BBCB vs. MBBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBCB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MBBB's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBCB vs. MBBB - Dividend Comparison

BBCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, more than MBBB's 5.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBCB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
7.15%5.02%5.22%4.22%3.39%3.47%4.59%5.25%0.20%
MBBB
VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF
5.08%4.99%4.93%4.51%3.22%2.29%0.19%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, BBCB and MBBB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MBBB has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to BBCB (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBCB dropped -22.48% vs MBBB's -21.73%.

On 5-year performance, MBBB leads with 1.11% vs 0.84% for BBCB. On fees, BBCB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BBCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MBBB has performed better with a 1.11% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBCB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MBBB.

BBCB has the higher dividend yield at 7.15%, compared with 5.08% for MBBB.

BBCB tracks Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade, while MBBB tracks MVIS Moody's Analytics US BBB Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBCB and 0.25% for MBBB.

BBCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBCB and MBBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer