BBCB vs. FLCO
BBCB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and FLCO (Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. BBCB is passively managed, while FLCO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBCB returned 0.84%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for FLCO. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBCB charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FLCO.
Performance
BBCB vs. FLCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBCB achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly higher than FLCO's 0.40% return.
BBCB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 8.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCO
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 5.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
BBCB vs. FLCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 2.82% | 7.69% | 1.97% | 8.42% | -15.72% | -2.23% | 10.39% | 14.86% | 0.43% |
FLCO Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF | 0.40% | 7.53% | 1.93% | 7.94% | -16.08% | -2.06% | 10.01% | 14.82% | 0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBCB and FLCO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2018 | 0.94 |
The correlation between BBCB and FLCO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBCB vs. FLCO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBCB
FLCO
Financial Services
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
BBCB
FLCO
Healthcare
BBCB
FLCO
Utilities
BBCB
FLCO
-
Technology
BBCB
FLCO
Industrials
BBCB
FLCO
Communication Services
BBCB
FLCO
Consumer Cyclical
BBCB
FLCO
Consumer Defensive
BBCB
FLCO
Energy
BBCB
FLCO
Real Estate
BBCB
FLCO
-
Basic Materials
BBCB
FLCO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBCB vs. FLCO — Risk / Return Rank
BBCB
FLCO
BBCB vs. FLCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB) and Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBCB | FLCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.22 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 2.05 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | 6.16 | +3.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBCB | FLCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 1.28 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.02 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.32 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
BBCB vs. FLCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBCB drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCO drawdown of -22.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCB and FLCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBCB | FLCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.48% | -22.71% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.95% | -2.76% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.46% | -6.59% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.32% | -22.48% | +0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -2.37% | +2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -5.88% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 0.92% | -0.09% |
Volatility
BBCB vs. FLCO - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB) and Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) have volatilities of 1.41% and 1.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBCB | FLCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 1.44% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.98% | 3.24% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.93% | 4.42% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.25% | 7.15% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 6.83% | +0.67% |
BBCB vs. FLCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBCB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBCB vs. FLCO - Dividend Comparison
BBCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, more than FLCO's 4.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 7.15% | 5.02% | 5.22% | 4.22% | 3.39% | 3.47% | 4.59% | 5.25% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLCO Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF | 4.66% | 4.60% | 4.63% | 3.83% | 3.85% | 2.85% | 3.99% | 3.39% | 3.86% | 3.33% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, BBCB and FLCO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FLCO has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to BBCB (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBCB dropped -22.48% vs FLCO's -22.71%.
On 5-year performance, BBCB leads with 0.84% vs 0.17% for FLCO. On fees, BBCB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBCB has performed better with a 0.84% return vs 0.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBCB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLCO.
BBCB has the higher dividend yield at 7.15%, compared with 4.66% for FLCO.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBCB and 0.35% for FLCO.
BBCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBCB and FLCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer