BBC vs. CNCR
BBC (Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF) and CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - BBC tracks the LifeSci Biotechnology Clinical Trials Index while CNCR tracks the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. Both are passively managed. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
BBC vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BBC
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- 13.54%
- YTD
- 25.75%
- 6M
- 22.73%
- 1Y
- 156.95%
- 3Y*
- 27.00%
- 5Y*
- -0.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
CNCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBC vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BBC Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF | 24.72% |
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% |
BBC vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBC
CNCR
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
BBC
CNCR
Basic Materials
BBC
-
CNCR
-
Communication Services
BBC
-
CNCR
-
Consumer Cyclical
BBC
-
CNCR
-
Consumer Defensive
BBC
-
CNCR
-
Energy
BBC
-
CNCR
-
Financial Services
BBC
-
CNCR
Industrials
BBC
-
CNCR
-
Real Estate
BBC
-
CNCR
-
Technology
BBC
-
CNCR
-
Utilities
BBC
-
CNCR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBC vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank
BBC
CNCR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBC vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF (BBC) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBC | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBC vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBC drawdown since its inception was -76.85%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBC and CNCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBC | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.85% | 0.00% | -76.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.28% | 0.00% | -19.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | 0.00% | -37.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | — | — |
Volatility
BBC vs. CNCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBC | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.27% | 0.00% | +36.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.52% | 0.00% | +39.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.75% | 0.00% | +37.75% |
BBC vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BBC and CNCR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
BBC vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison
BBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBC Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF | 1.35% | 1.70% | 1.00% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.51% |
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBC and CNCR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
BBC has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.
BBC tracks LifeSci Biotechnology Clinical Trials Index, while CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Exchange Traded Concepts.
Find the right allocation for BBC and CNCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer