PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBBS vs. SPTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBBS vs. SPTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBBS achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than SPTS's 0.52% return.


BBBS

1D
0.02%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.77%
6M
1.23%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPTS

1D
0.07%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.91%
1Y
3.31%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBBS vs. SPTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBBS and SPTS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024

0.80

The correlation between BBBS and SPTS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBBS vs. SPTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBBS
BBBS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BBBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTS
SPTS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SPTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBBS vs. SPTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBBSSPTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.53

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.96

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

15.95

-3.36

BBBS vs. SPTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the SPTS Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBBS and SPTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBBSSPTSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.55

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.37

0.49

+1.87

Drawdowns

BBBS vs. SPTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBBS drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum SPTS drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBS and SPTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBBSSPTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-5.83%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-0.84%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.21%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-1.72%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

0.21%

+0.14%

Volatility

BBBS vs. SPTS - Volatility Comparison

Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) has a higher volatility of 0.49% compared to SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) at 0.34%. This indicates that BBBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBBSSPTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

0.34%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

0.86%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

1.32%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.23%

1.98%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.23%

1.72%

+0.51%

BBBS vs. SPTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBBS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTS's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBBS vs. SPTS - Dividend Comparison

BBBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than SPTS's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBBS
Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.58%4.55%4.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
3.91%3.99%4.25%3.61%1.27%0.19%0.70%2.21%2.04%1.20%0.95%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBBS and SPTS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBBS has higher volatility (0.49%) compared to SPTS (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBS dropped -1.45% vs SPTS's -5.83%.

On 1-year performance, BBBS leads with 4.44% vs 3.31% for SPTS. On fees, SPTS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTS has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBBS has performed better with a 4.44% return vs 3.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBBS.

BBBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 3.91% for SPTS.

BBBS is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SPTS is Government Bonds. BBBS tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index, while SPTS tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBS and 0.03% for SPTS.

SPTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBBS and SPTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer