PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBBS vs. BBBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBBS vs. BBBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBBS achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than BBBI's 0.92% return.


BBBS

1D
0.08%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.13%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBBI

1D
0.11%
1M
0.74%
YTD
0.92%
6M
0.84%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBBS vs. BBBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBBS and BBBI is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024

0.91

The correlation between BBBS and BBBI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBBS vs. BBBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBBS
BBBS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BBBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BBBI
BBBI Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BBBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBI Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBI Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBBS vs. BBBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBBSBBBIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.24

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

1.87

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.90

6.10

+5.80

BBBS vs. BBBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the BBBI Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBBS and BBBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBBS vs. BBBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBBS drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum BBBI drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBS and BBBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBBSBBBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-4.11%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-2.94%

+1.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-0.98%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.90%

-0.54%

Volatility

BBBS vs. BBBI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) is 0.63%, while BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBI) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that BBBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBBSBBBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

1.23%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.45%

3.12%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89%

4.01%

-2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.24%

5.00%

-2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.24%

5.00%

-2.76%

BBBS vs. BBBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BBBS and BBBI have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBBS vs. BBBI - Dividend Comparison

BBBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than BBBI's 4.77% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, BBBS and BBBI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBBI has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to BBBS (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBS dropped -1.45% vs BBBI's -4.11%.

On 1-year performance, BBBI leads with 5.47% vs 4.26% for BBBS. Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. On volatility, BBBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBBI has performed better with a 5.47% return vs 4.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBBS and BBBI have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

BBBI has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 4.57% for BBBS.

BBBS is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BBBI is Corporate Bonds. BBBS tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index, while BBBI tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 5-10 Year Index.

BBBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBBS and BBBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer