BBBI vs. SPLB
BBBI (BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF) and SPLB (SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - BBBI tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 5-10 Year Index while SPLB tracks the Bloomberg Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BBBI returned 6.02% vs 6.78% for SPLB. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBBI charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SPLB.
Performance
BBBI vs. SPLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBBI achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than SPLB's 1.28% return.
BBBI
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 6.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPLB
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 6.78%
- 3Y*
- 4.59%
- 5Y*
- -1.77%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
BBBI vs. SPLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BBBI BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.46% | 9.28% | 4.37% |
SPLB SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF | 1.28% | 7.05% | 0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBBI and SPLB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024 | 0.92 |
The correlation between BBBI and SPLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBBI vs. SPLB — Risk / Return Rank
BBBI
SPLB
BBBI vs. SPLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBI) and SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBBI | SPLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.15 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 1.26 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | 3.11 | +3.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBBI | SPLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 0.85 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.45 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
BBBI vs. SPLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBBI drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum SPLB drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBI and SPLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBBI | SPLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -34.46% | +30.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -5.42% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -14.23% | +13.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -8.01% | +7.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 2.18% | -1.32% |
Volatility
BBBI vs. SPLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBI) is 1.32%, while SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) has a volatility of 2.29%. This indicates that BBBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBBI | SPLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 2.29% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.00% | 5.82% | -2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.98% | 8.05% | -4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 12.70% | -7.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 12.94% | -7.93% |
BBBI vs. SPLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBBI has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLB's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBBI vs. SPLB - Dividend Comparison
BBBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than SPLB's 5.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBBI BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.79% | 4.90% | 4.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPLB SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.36% | 5.25% | 5.20% | 4.60% | 4.53% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 3.79% | 4.50% | 4.06% | 4.34% | 4.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BBBI and SPLB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPLB has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to BBBI (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBI dropped -4.11% vs SPLB's -34.46%.
On 1-year performance, SPLB leads with 6.78% vs 6.02% for BBBI. On fees, SPLB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BBBI has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPLB has performed better with a 6.78% return vs 6.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPLB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBBI.
SPLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.36%, compared with 4.79% for BBBI.
BBBI tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 5-10 Year Index, while SPLB tracks Bloomberg Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBI and 0.07% for SPLB.
BBBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBBI and SPLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer