BATT vs. TKC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC).

BATT is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Jun 6, 2018.

Performance

BATT vs. TKC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BATT vs. TKC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	8.99%	59.70%	-13.93%	-7.05%	-32.25%	16.52%	44.43%	-2.40%	-42.45%
TKC Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.	10.79%	-12.66%	39.58%	2.46%	38.18%	-28.03%	-4.86%	7.00%	-5.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATT achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than TKC's 10.79% return.

BATT

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -7.16%
• YTD: 8.99%
• 6M: 16.65%
• 1Y: 82.30%
• 3Y*: 8.21%
• 5Y*: 2.14%
• 10Y*: —

TKC

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -7.90%
• YTD: 10.79%
• 6M: 0.88%
• 1Y: 0.46%
• 3Y*: 15.52%
• 5Y*: 9.32%
• 10Y*: -0.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BATT vs. TKC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 95
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

TKC

TKC Risk / Return Rank: 38
TKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
TKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
TKC Omega Ratio Rank: 34
TKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
TKC Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATT vs. TKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BATT	TKC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	0.02	+2.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	0.24	+2.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.03	+0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.64	0.07	+4.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.14	0.16	+16.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BATT vs. TKC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATT Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the TKC Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATT and TKC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BATT	TKC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	0.02	+2.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	0.25	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	-0.03	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between BATT and TKC is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BATT vs. TKC - Dividend Comparison

BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than TKC's 3.64% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.70%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TKC Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.	3.64%	4.03%	3.14%	1.98%	1.72%	9.59%	2.19%	3.48%	8.57%	10.52%	0.00%	16.91%

Drawdowns

BATT vs. TKC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, smaller than the maximum TKC drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT and TKC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BATT	TKC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.38%	-92.94%	+23.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.58%	-17.34%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.98%	-50.59%	-11.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.47%	-57.96%	+42.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.40%	-56.67%	+21.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.87%	8.20%	-3.33%

Volatility

BATT vs. TKC - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a higher volatility of 12.38% compared to Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC) at 7.71%. This indicates that BATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TKC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BATT	TKC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.38%	7.71%	+4.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.10%	19.70%	+5.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.28%	29.62%	+2.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.24%	37.91%	-8.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.55%	37.36%	-6.81%