BATT vs. TKC
BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Amplify, while TKC (Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, BATT returned 3.45%/yr vs 8.15%/yr for TKC. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BATT vs. TKC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATT achieves a 26.16% return, which is significantly higher than TKC's 7.50% return.
BATT
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 26.16%
- 6M
- 29.61%
- 1Y
- 103.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- —
TKC
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- 7.50%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 1.70%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 0.12%
BATT vs. TKC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 26.16% | 59.70% | -13.93% | -7.05% | -32.25% | 16.52% | 44.43% | -2.40% | -42.45% |
TKC Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. | 7.50% | -12.66% | 39.58% | 2.46% | 38.18% | -28.03% | -4.86% | 7.00% | -5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between BATT and TKC is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2018 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BATT vs. TKC — Risk / Return Rank
BATT
TKC
BATT vs. TKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BATT | TKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.04 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.12 | 0.08 | +6.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.20 | 0.18 | +22.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BATT | TKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38 | 0.06 | +3.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.21 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | -0.04 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
BATT vs. TKC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, smaller than the maximum TKC drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT and TKC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATT | TKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -92.94% | +23.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.03% | -20.70% | +3.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.65% | -30.32% | -17.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.98% | -50.59% | -11.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.44% | -59.20% | +55.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.78% | -56.67% | +21.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.68% | 9.44% | -4.76% |
Volatility
BATT vs. TKC - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC) have volatilities of 10.29% and 10.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BATT | TKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | 10.57% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.67% | 20.19% | +4.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.80% | 29.65% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.57% | 38.13% | -8.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 37.34% | -6.74% |
Dividends
BATT vs. TKC - Dividend Comparison
BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than TKC's 3.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 1.47% | 1.85% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 4.14% | 2.32% | 0.21% | 3.22% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TKC Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. | 3.75% | 4.03% | 3.14% | 1.98% | 1.72% | 9.59% | 2.19% | 3.48% | 8.57% | 10.52% | 0.00% | 16.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BATT and TKC have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TKC has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to BATT (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATT dropped -69.38% vs TKC's -92.94%.
BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BATT and TKC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer