BATT vs. BITI
BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BATT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund actively managed by Amplify, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. BATT is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BATT returned 5.35%/yr vs -32.35%/yr for BITI. Their -0.38 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BATT charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
BATT vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATT achieves a 4.71% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 25.22% return.
BATT
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- 6M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- 4.71%
- 1Y
- 50.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- -2.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.84%
BITI
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- 6M
- 13.09%
- YTD
- 25.22%
- 1Y
- 56.28%
- 3Y*
- -32.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -35.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $636.05K | $767.46K | $1.35M | |
| $24.18M | $25.87M | $38.72M |
BATT vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 4.71% | 59.70% | -13.93% | -7.05% | -16.36% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 25.22% | -1.76% | -62.60% | -66.17% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BATT and BITI is -0.46, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022 | -0.38 |
The correlation between BATT and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.46 (1 year) to -0.35 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BATT vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
BATT
BITI
BATT vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BATT | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.22 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.24 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.21 | 5.45 | +0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BATT vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATT | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -92.16% | +22.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.02% | -25.28% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.26% | -84.63% | +39.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.86% | -86.33% | +66.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.39% | -68.61% | +34.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.18% | 10.37% | -2.19% |
Volatility
BATT vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 8.93%. This indicates that BATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BATT | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.05% | 8.93% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.20% | 33.35% | -6.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.68% | 44.25% | -10.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.01% | 52.01% | -22.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.78% | 52.01% | -21.23% |
BATT vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BATT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BATT vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than BITI's 21.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 1.77% | 1.85% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 4.14% | 2.32% | 0.21% | 3.22% | 0.89% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 21.80% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BATT and BITI have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BATT has higher volatility (10.05%) compared to BITI (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATT dropped -69.38% vs BITI's -92.16%.
On 3-year performance, BATT leads with 5.35% vs -32.35% for BITI. On fees, BATT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 8.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BATT has performed better with a 5.35% return vs -32.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BATT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 21.80%, compared with 1.77% for BATT.
BATT is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BATT and 1.03% for BITI.
BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BATT and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer