PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BATG.DE vs. XDJP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BATG.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BATG.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDJP.DE

1D
-1.43%
1M
7.59%
YTD
32.10%
6M
30.23%
1Y
60.51%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATG.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BATG.DE
L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF
0.00%5.88%12.80%12.76%1.17%
XDJP.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
32.10%16.25%14.44%18.02%-1.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BATG.DE and XDJP.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022

0.65

The correlation between BATG.DE and XDJP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BATG.DE vs. XDJP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATG.DE

XDJP.DE
XDJP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XDJP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATG.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATG.DE) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BATG.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BATG.DEXDJP.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

Drawdowns

BATG.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BATG.DEXDJP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

Volatility

BATG.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BATG.DEXDJP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.76%

BATG.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATG.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than XDJP.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BATG.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Dividend Comparison

BATG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDJP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATG.DE
L&G Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDJP.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
1.03%1.36%1.38%1.59%2.60%1.16%1.14%1.11%1.28%0.75%0.89%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


BATG.DE and XDJP.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDJP.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDJP.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for BATG.DE.

BATG.DE tracks Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Japan, while XDJP.DE tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for BATG.DE and 0.09% for XDJP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BATG.DE and XDJP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer