BATF.DE vs. IQQT.DE
BATF.DE (L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF) and IQQT.DE (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - BATF.DE tracks the Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Pacific ex Japan while IQQT.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BATF.DE returned 7.05%/yr vs 40.38%/yr for IQQT.DE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BATF.DE charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IQQT.DE.
Performance
BATF.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATF.DE achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than IQQT.DE's 70.08% return.
BATF.DE
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 3.58%
- 1Y
- 7.37%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQQT.DE
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 14.31%
- YTD
- 70.08%
- 6M
- 75.07%
- 1Y
- 111.86%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.81%
BATF.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATF.DE L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF | 2.86% | 8.25% | 10.50% | -0.71% | 6.02% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 70.08% | 17.20% | 30.72% | 24.49% | 7.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between BATF.DE and IQQT.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022 | 0.53 |
The correlation between BATF.DE and IQQT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BATF.DE vs. IQQT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BATF.DE
IQQT.DE
BATF.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BATF.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.72 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 12.46 | -11.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.74 | 35.53 | -32.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BATF.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 4.62 | -4.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.48 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
BATF.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATF.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.62%, smaller than the maximum IQQT.DE drawdown of -57.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATF.DE and IQQT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATF.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.62% | -57.60% | +38.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -8.93% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.62% | -31.65% | +13.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -1.61% | -4.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -12.71% | +7.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 3.14% | -0.46% |
Volatility
BATF.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE) is 3.62%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that BATF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BATF.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | 10.13% | -6.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.97% | 19.53% | -10.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 24.10% | -12.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 21.89% | -7.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 20.80% | -6.35% |
BATF.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BATF.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQT.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
BATF.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Dividend Comparison
BATF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATF.DE L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 2.17% | 3.61% | 1.31% | 1.80% | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BATF.DE and IQQT.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BATF.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BATF.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
BATF.DE tracks Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Pacific ex Japan, while IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35. They also come from different issuers: LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for BATF.DE and 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
Find the right allocation for BATF.DE and IQQT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer