BATEX vs. JHTFX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio (BATEX) and John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX).
BATEX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 3, 2014. JHTFX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1993.
Performance
BATEX vs. JHTFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BATEX vs. JHTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATEX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio | -0.89% | 3.22% | 4.74% | 6.45% | -14.23% | 8.28% | 5.77% | 10.92% | 1.75% | 8.76% |
JHTFX John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | -0.94% | 3.07% | 6.57% | 6.84% | -16.77% | 5.69% | 4.65% | 9.50% | 0.61% | 6.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATEX achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly higher than JHTFX's -0.94% return. Over the past 10 years, BATEX has outperformed JHTFX with an annualized return of 2.94%, while JHTFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.21% annualized return.
BATEX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 1.72%
- 3Y*
- 3.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- 2.94%
JHTFX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 0.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.24%
- 5Y*
- 0.22%
- 10Y*
- 2.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BATEX vs. JHTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BATEX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than JHTFX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BATEX vs. JHTFX — Risk / Return Rank
BATEX
JHTFX
BATEX vs. JHTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio (BATEX) and John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BATEX | JHTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | 0.22 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.49 | 0.34 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.07 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 0.28 | +0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.98 | 0.68 | +0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BATEX | JHTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 0.22 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.04 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.40 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.93 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between BATEX and JHTFX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BATEX vs. JHTFX - Dividend Comparison
BATEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, less than JHTFX's 5.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATEX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio | 4.73% | 5.01% | 3.74% | 2.98% | 5.41% | 3.29% | 3.50% | 3.80% | 4.75% | 2.88% | 0.98% | 0.13% |
JHTFX John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 5.12% | 6.24% | 4.03% | 3.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.76% | 6.05% | 4.45% | 4.55% | 4.43% | 4.67% |
Drawdowns
BATEX vs. JHTFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATEX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, smaller than the maximum JHTFX drawdown of -22.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATEX and JHTFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATEX | JHTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.90% | -22.40% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -7.36% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.90% | -22.40% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.90% | -22.40% | +2.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -3.52% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -2.91% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 3.06% | -0.26% |
Volatility
BATEX vs. JHTFX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio (BATEX) and John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (JHTFX) have volatilities of 1.31% and 1.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BATEX | JHTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 1.33% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.29% | 2.33% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.69% | 7.53% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 5.82% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 5.54% | +0.33% |