BASV vs. AVLV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BASV (Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF) and AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past year, BASV returned 20.72% vs 37.53% for AVLV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BASV charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVLV.

Performance

BASV vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BASV achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 20.57% return.

BASV

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 4.84%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 6M: 8.35%
• 1Y: 20.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVLV

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 1.99%
• YTD: 20.57%
• 6M: 19.54%
• 1Y: 37.53%
• 3Y*: 22.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BASV vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BASV Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF	9.54%	10.32%
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	20.57%	14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BASV and AVLV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025	0.84

The correlation between BASV and AVLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BASV vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BASV

BASV Risk / Return Rank: 48
BASV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
BASV Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
BASV Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BASV Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BASV Martin Ratio Rank: 50

AVLV

AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 91
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BASV vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BASV	AVLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.99	-1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	4.11	-1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.53	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	5.90	-3.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.81	23.36	-15.55

BASV vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BASV Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the AVLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BASV and AVLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BASV vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BASV drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum AVLV drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BASV and AVLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BASV	AVLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-19.50%	+10.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.43%	-6.39%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-1.30%	+0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-3.89%	+2.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	1.61%	+1.05%

Volatility

BASV vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) at 3.99%. This indicates that BASV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BASV	AVLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	3.99%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.01%	9.41%	+1.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.83%	12.60%	+1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.75%	17.33%	-3.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.75%	17.33%	-3.58%

BASV vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BASV has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BASV vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

BASV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than AVLV's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	1.38%	1.33%	1.58%	1.85%	2.00%	0.29%
BASV Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF	0.38%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BASV and AVLV in my portfolio?

BASV and AVLV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BASV or AVLV?

BASV has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to AVLV (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BASV dropped -9.43% vs AVLV's -19.50%.

Which ETF is better, BASV or AVLV?

On 1-year performance, AVLV leads with 37.53% vs 20.72% for BASV. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BASV or AVLV?

Over the 1-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 37.53% return vs 20.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BASV or AVLV?

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BASV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BASV or AVLV?

AVLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.38% for BASV.

What is the main difference between BASV and AVLV?

They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BASV and 0.15% for AVLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.