PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BASG vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BASG vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BASG achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 9.19% return.


BASG

1D
-1.27%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
-1.27%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DGRO

1D
0.32%
1M
0.80%
YTD
9.19%
6M
8.52%
1Y
22.22%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BASG vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BASG and DGRO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025

0.50

The correlation between BASG and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BASG vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BASG
BASG Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BASG Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BASG Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BASG vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BASGDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.42

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

3.45

-3.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.38

13.31

-12.93

BASG vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BASG Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BASG and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BASG vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BASG drawdown since its inception was -19.30%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BASG and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BASGDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.30%

-35.10%

+15.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.30%

-6.47%

-12.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-0.90%

-5.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-3.43%

-2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.46%

1.67%

+5.79%

Volatility

BASG vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.63%. This indicates that BASG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BASGDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

2.63%

+4.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.01%

6.94%

+7.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

9.53%

+7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

13.80%

+3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

16.60%

+0.47%

BASG vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BASG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

BASG vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

BASG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BASG
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.97%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


BASG and DGRO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BASG has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to DGRO (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BASG dropped -19.30% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 1-year performance, DGRO leads with 22.22% vs 2.81% for BASG. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 22.22% return vs 2.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for BASG.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.00% for BASG.

They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for BASG and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BASG and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer