BASE.TO vs. SIXY.TO
BASE.TO (Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF) and SIXY.TO (Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BASE.TO is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Materials & Mining, while SIXY.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BASE.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SIXY.TO.
Performance
BASE.TO vs. SIXY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BASE.TO achieves a 29.75% return, which is significantly higher than SIXY.TO's 17.44% return.
BASE.TO
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 6.77%
- YTD
- 29.75%
- 6M
- 33.42%
- 1Y
- 59.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.08%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
SIXY.TO
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 6.45%
- YTD
- 17.44%
- 6M
- 23.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BASE.TO vs. SIXY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BASE.TO Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF | 29.75% | 3.17% |
SIXY.TO Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF | 17.44% | 5.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BASE.TO and SIXY.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BASE.TO vs. SIXY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BASE.TO
SIXY.TO
BASE.TO vs. SIXY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF (BASE.TO) and Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF (SIXY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BASE.TO | SIXY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.44 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BASE.TO | SIXY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 3.10 | -2.51 |
Drawdowns
BASE.TO vs. SIXY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BASE.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, which is greater than SIXY.TO's maximum drawdown of -9.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BASE.TO and SIXY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BASE.TO | SIXY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.43% | -9.64% | -23.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -1.39% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.31% | -1.83% | -7.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | — | — |
Volatility
BASE.TO vs. SIXY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BASE.TO | SIXY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.27% | 17.32% | +4.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.01% | 17.32% | +5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.37% | 17.32% | +9.05% |
BASE.TO vs. SIXY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BASE.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXY.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
BASE.TO vs. SIXY.TO - Dividend Comparison
BASE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, less than SIXY.TO's 8.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BASE.TO Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF | 7.85% | 9.55% | 11.20% | 8.80% | 8.96% | 5.95% | 4.67% | 2.88% |
SIXY.TO Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF | 8.77% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BASE.TO and SIXY.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BASE.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BASE.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SIXY.TO.
BASE.TO is categorized as Materials, while SIXY.TO is Financials Equities. BASE.TO tracks Solactive Materials & Mining, while SIXY.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for BASE.TO and 0.60% for SIXY.TO.
Find the right allocation for BASE.TO and SIXY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer