BASE.TO vs. UTES.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BASE.TO (Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF) and UTES.TO (Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BASE.TO is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Materials & Mining, while UTES.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Evolve. BASE.TO is passively managed, while UTES.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, BASE.TO returned 59.98% vs 23.90% for UTES.TO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BASE.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for UTES.TO.

Performance

BASE.TO vs. UTES.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF (BASE.TO) and Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BASE.TO achieves a 29.75% return, which is significantly higher than UTES.TO's 12.58% return.

BASE.TO

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 6.77%
• YTD: 29.75%
• 6M: 33.42%
• 1Y: 59.98%
• 3Y*: 18.08%
• 5Y*: 8.92%
• 10Y*: —

UTES.TO

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 2.26%
• YTD: 12.58%
• 6M: 12.56%
• 1Y: 23.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BASE.TO vs. UTES.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BASE.TO Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF	29.75%	30.33%	-6.12%
UTES.TO Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF	12.58%	18.66%	-4.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BASE.TO and UTES.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	0.06

Return for Risk

BASE.TO vs. UTES.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BASE.TO

BASE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 79
BASE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BASE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BASE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BASE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
BASE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

UTES.TO

UTES.TO Risk / Return Rank: 75
UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
UTES.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
UTES.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
UTES.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
UTES.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BASE.TO vs. UTES.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF (BASE.TO) and Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BASE.TO	UTES.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	2.59	+0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	3.79	-0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.46	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	3.75	+0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.44	11.90	+4.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BASE.TO vs. UTES.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BASE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BASE.TO and UTES.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BASE.TO	UTES.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	2.59	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	1.38	-0.79

Drawdowns

BASE.TO vs. UTES.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BASE.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, which is greater than UTES.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BASE.TO and UTES.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BASE.TO	UTES.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.43%	-10.19%	-23.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.68%	-6.39%	-9.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.99%	-1.86%	+0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.31%	-2.62%	-6.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	2.03%	+1.63%

Volatility

BASE.TO vs. UTES.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF (BASE.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) at 2.96%. This indicates that BASE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTES.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BASE.TO	UTES.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.55%	2.96%	+4.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.54%	7.51%	+10.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.27%	9.28%	+12.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.01%	11.01%	+12.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.37%	11.01%	+15.36%

BASE.TO vs. UTES.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BASE.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than UTES.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BASE.TO vs. UTES.TO - Dividend Comparison

BASE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, less than UTES.TO's 17.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BASE.TO Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF	7.85%	9.55%	11.20%	8.80%	8.96%	5.95%	4.67%	2.88%
UTES.TO Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF	17.48%	18.30%	6.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BASE.TO and UTES.TO in my portfolio?

BASE.TO and UTES.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BASE.TO or UTES.TO?

On fees, BASE.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BASE.TO or UTES.TO?

BASE.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for UTES.TO.

What is the main difference between BASE.TO and UTES.TO?

BASE.TO is categorized as Materials, while UTES.TO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for BASE.TO and 0.60% for UTES.TO.