BASE.TO vs. BIGY.TO
BASE.TO (Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF) and BIGY.TO (Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BASE.TO is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Materials & Mining, while BIGY.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Evolve. BASE.TO is passively managed, while BIGY.TO is actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BASE.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BIGY.TO.
Performance
BASE.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BASE.TO achieves a 29.75% return, which is significantly higher than BIGY.TO's -3.71% return.
BASE.TO
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 6.77%
- YTD
- 29.75%
- 6M
- 33.42%
- 1Y
- 59.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.08%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
BIGY.TO
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- -3.71%
- 6M
- -6.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BASE.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BASE.TO Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF | 29.75% | 13.52% |
BIGY.TO Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF | -3.71% | 0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between BASE.TO and BIGY.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BASE.TO vs. BIGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BASE.TO
BIGY.TO
BASE.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF (BASE.TO) and Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF (BIGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BASE.TO | BIGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.44 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BASE.TO | BIGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | -0.15 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
BASE.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BASE.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, which is greater than BIGY.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BASE.TO and BIGY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BASE.TO | BIGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.43% | -27.82% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -13.63% | +12.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.31% | -11.30% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | — | — |
Volatility
BASE.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BASE.TO | BIGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.27% | 28.63% | -6.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.01% | 28.63% | -5.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.37% | 28.63% | -2.26% |
BASE.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BASE.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BIGY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BASE.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
BASE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, less than BIGY.TO's 28.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BASE.TO Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF | 7.85% | 9.55% | 11.20% | 8.80% | 8.96% | 5.95% | 4.67% | 2.88% |
BIGY.TO Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF | 28.15% | 9.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BASE.TO and BIGY.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BASE.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BASE.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BIGY.TO.
BASE.TO is categorized as Materials, while BIGY.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for BASE.TO and 0.40% for BIGY.TO.
Find the right allocation for BASE.TO and BIGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer