BAPR vs. FFTY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BAPR returned 10.86%/yr vs -0.44%/yr for FFTY. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.

Performance

BAPR vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAPR achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 20.94% return.

BAPR

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 10.04%
• 6M: 10.03%
• 1Y: 18.64%
• 3Y*: 14.48%
• 5Y*: 10.86%
• 10Y*: —

FFTY

• 1D: -4.21%
• 1M: 5.39%
• YTD: 20.94%
• 6M: 18.21%
• 1Y: 36.43%
• 3Y*: 21.26%
• 5Y*: -0.44%
• 10Y*: 7.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAPR vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	10.04%	8.28%	15.95%	23.16%	-7.04%	12.58%	6.19%	10.36%
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	20.94%	23.38%	18.36%	12.40%	-51.08%	11.92%	18.20%	3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BAPR and FFTY is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2019	0.70

The correlation between BAPR and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

BAPR vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAPR	FFTY
Technology	38.4%	39.4%
Financial Services	11.0%	6.7%
Communication Services	10.8%	2.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	2.3%
Healthcare	8.4%	12.8%
Industrials	7.9%	23.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	2.8%
Energy	3.2%	7.3%
Utilities	2.1%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	2.9%

Return for Risk

BAPR vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAPR

BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

FFTY

FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 30
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 29
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAPR vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAPR	FFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.24	1.02	+2.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.31	1.44	+3.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.76	1.19	+0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.69	1.57	+8.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	47.41	4.14	+43.27

BAPR vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the FFTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAPR and FFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAPR vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAPR drawdown since its inception was -23.91%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAPR and FFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAPR	FFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.91%	-59.46%	+35.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.93%	-23.29%	+21.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.58%	-29.60%	+14.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.58%	-59.46%	+43.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	-14.76%	+13.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.58%	-22.34%	+19.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.39%	8.82%	-8.43%

Volatility

BAPR vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) is 2.06%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that BAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAPR	FFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.06%	13.44%	-11.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.91%	28.50%	-23.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.79%	35.99%	-30.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.51%	29.63%	-18.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.09%	27.67%	-14.58%

BAPR vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAPR vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

BAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	1.11%	1.35%	0.91%	0.65%	2.75%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAPR and FFTY in my portfolio?

BAPR and FFTY have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAPR or FFTY?

FFTY has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to BAPR (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAPR dropped -23.91% vs FFTY's -59.46%.

Which ETF is better, BAPR or FFTY?

On 5-year performance, BAPR leads with 10.86% vs -0.44% for FFTY. On fees, BAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BAPR has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAPR or FFTY?

Over the 5-year period, BAPR has performed better with a 10.86% return vs -0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAPR or FFTY?

BAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAPR or FFTY?

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.00% for BAPR.

What is the main difference between BAPR and FFTY?

BAPR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. BAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April, while FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BAPR and 0.80% for FFTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.