BAMV vs. MFVL

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BAMV (Brookstone Value Stock ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BAMV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFVL.

Performance

BAMV vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMV achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's 6.37% return.

BAMV

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 3.79%
• 6M: 11.36%
• YTD: 14.45%
• 1Y: 19.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.23%

MFVL

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 4.63%
• 6M: 5.12%
• YTD: 6.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF	$485.78K	$484.91K	$458.78K
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	$67.62K	$51.56K	$91.97K

BAMV vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF	14.45%	0.14%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	6.37%	1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMV and MFVL is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025	0.64

Return for Risk

BAMV vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BAMV

BAMV Risk / Return Rank: 71
BAMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
BAMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BAMV Omega Ratio Rank: 62
BAMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
BAMV Martin Ratio Rank: 74

MFVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BAMV vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMV	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.28	—	—

Drawdowns

BAMV vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMV drawdown since its inception was -14.56%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMV and MFVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMV	MFVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.56%	-7.03%	-7.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.89%	+1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	-2.53%	+0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BAMV	MFVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.56%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.04%	13.82%	-1.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.59%	13.82%	-0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.59%	13.82%	-0.23%

BAMV vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMV vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison

BAMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF	1.22%	1.32%	3.66%	0.19%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMV and MFVL in my portfolio?

BAMV and MFVL have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BAMV or MFVL?

On fees, MFVL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMV or MFVL?

MFVL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMV or MFVL?

BAMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.

What is the main difference between BAMV and MFVL?

They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMV and 0.50% for MFVL.