PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMV vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BAMV vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BAMV vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BAMV
Brookstone Value Stock ETF
0.50%7.66%12.03%13.82%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
12.30%11.90%14.16%3.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMV achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 12.30% return.


BAMV

1D
2.12%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
0.50%
6M
2.42%
1Y
5.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDV

1D
0.24%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
12.30%
6M
12.67%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAMV vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BAMV vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMV
BAMV Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BAMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMV vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMVHDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.33

1.24

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.57

1.70

-1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.25

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

1.65

-1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.13

6.01

-3.88

BAMV vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMV and HDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMVHDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

1.24

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.73

+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between BAMV and HDV is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BAMV vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

BAMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than HDV's 2.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAMV
Brookstone Value Stock ETF
1.26%1.32%3.66%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.92%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%

Drawdowns

BAMV vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMV drawdown since its inception was -14.56%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMV and HDV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMVHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.56%

-37.04%

+22.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.61%

-10.04%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.80%

-2.58%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.09%

-3.09%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

2.88%

-0.01%

Volatility

BAMV vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 2.94%. This indicates that BAMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BAMVHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

2.94%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

7.06%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.72%

12.79%

+3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

12.78%

+1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.89%

15.70%

-1.81%