BAMV vs. HDV
BAMV (Brookstone Value Stock ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAMV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Brookstone, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. BAMV is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. Over the past year, BAMV returned 19.28% vs 25.63% for HDV. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BAMV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
BAMV vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAMV achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 20.03% return.
BAMV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- YTD
- 14.45%
- 1Y
- 19.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.23%
HDV
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 10.43%
- YTD
- 20.03%
- 1Y
- 25.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.43%
- 5Y*
- 12.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $485.78K | $484.91K | $458.78K | |
| $196.84M | $160.55M | $106.56M |
BAMV vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF | 14.45% | 7.66% | 12.03% | 13.82% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 20.03% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 3.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAMV and HDV is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BAMV and HDV has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BAMV vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BAMV
HDV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
BAMV
HDV
Technology
BAMV
HDV
Industrials
BAMV
HDV
Healthcare
BAMV
HDV
Communication Services
BAMV
HDV
Energy
BAMV
HDV
Basic Materials
BAMV
HDV
Real Estate
BAMV
HDV
-
Consumer Cyclical
BAMV
HDV
Consumer Defensive
BAMV
HDV
Utilities
BAMV
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAMV vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
BAMV
HDV
BAMV vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAMV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.42 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 4.98 | -2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 13.63 | -4.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAMV vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAMV drawdown since its inception was -14.56%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMV and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAMV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.56% | -37.04% | +22.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -5.18% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.41% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.94% | -3.06% | +1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.89% | +0.10% |
Volatility
BAMV vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) is 3.01%, while iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that BAMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAMV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 4.98% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.56% | 8.72% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.04% | 10.85% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.59% | 12.95% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.59% | 15.78% | -2.19% |
BAMV vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAMV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
BAMV vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
BAMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than HDV's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF | 1.22% | 1.32% | 3.66% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 3.07% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAMV and HDV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to BAMV (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMV dropped -14.56% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 1-year performance, HDV leads with 25.63% vs 19.28% for BAMV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, BAMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HDV has performed better with a 25.63% return vs 19.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMV.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 1.22% for BAMV.
BAMV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMV and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAMV and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer