BALI vs. QRMI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF (BALI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI).

BALI and QRMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BALI is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023. QRMI is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021.

Performance

BALI vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF (BALI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BALI vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BALI Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF	-0.91%	14.51%	22.38%	9.52%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	-2.50%	3.76%	14.72%	3.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BALI achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly higher than QRMI's -2.50% return.

BALI

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: -3.34%
• YTD: -0.91%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 17.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QRMI

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -2.37%
• YTD: -2.50%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 2.76%
• 3Y*: 6.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BALI vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BALI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

QRMI

Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF

BALI

Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF

Return for Risk

BALI vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BALI

BALI Risk / Return Rank: 66
BALI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BALI Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
BALI Omega Ratio Rank: 69
BALI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
BALI Martin Ratio Rank: 76

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 21
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 20
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BALI vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF (BALI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BALI	QRMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	0.36	+0.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	0.55	+1.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.08	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	0.55	+1.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.32	1.59	+6.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BALI vs. QRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BALI Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the QRMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BALI and QRMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BALI	QRMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	0.36	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.40	0.09	+1.30

Correlation

The correlation between BALI and QRMI is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BALI vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison

BALI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.08%, less than QRMI's 12.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BALI Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF	9.08%	8.51%	7.13%	2.13%	0.00%	0.00%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.66%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%

Drawdowns

BALI vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BALI drawdown since its inception was -16.65%, smaller than the maximum QRMI drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALI and QRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BALI	QRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.65%	-20.95%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.86%	-5.04%	-5.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.64%	-3.54%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.71%	-8.25%	+6.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	1.74%	+0.39%

Volatility

BALI vs. QRMI - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF (BALI) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) at 3.02%. This indicates that BALI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BALI	QRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.62%	3.02%	+1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.96%	4.93%	+3.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.60%	7.77%	+7.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.13%	8.46%	+4.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.13%	8.46%	+4.67%