BAICX vs. WFSPX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX).
BAICX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 7, 2008. WFSPX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jul 30, 1993.
Performance
BAICX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAICX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio | -1.72% | 11.53% | 7.19% | 9.24% | -12.42% | 6.61% | 6.34% | 13.61% | -3.78% | 8.79% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund | -7.06% | 17.83% | 24.94% | 26.25% | -18.14% | 28.63% | 18.43% | 31.45% | -4.83% | 21.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAICX achieves a -1.72% return, which is significantly higher than WFSPX's -7.06% return. Over the past 10 years, BAICX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 4.85%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.63% annualized return.
BAICX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- -1.72%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 7.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.85%
WFSPX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -7.06%
- 6M
- -4.63%
- 1Y
- 14.40%
- 3Y*
- 17.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAICX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAICX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BAICX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank
BAICX
WFSPX
BAICX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAICX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 0.84 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.30 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.20 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.06 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | 5.13 | +1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAICX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 0.84 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.68 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.76 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.13 | +0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAICX and WFSPX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BAICX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison
BAICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, more than WFSPX's 1.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio | 5.98% | 6.26% | 5.85% | 4.20% | 4.21% | 4.90% | 4.07% | 4.69% | 5.28% | 4.60% | 4.71% | 5.34% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund | 1.58% | 1.72% | 1.41% | 1.50% | 2.02% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 1.99% | 2.00% | 1.62% | 2.37% | 2.49% |
Drawdowns
BAICX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAICX drawdown since its inception was -33.29%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAICX and WFSPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAICX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.29% | -58.21% | +24.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.00% | -12.11% | +7.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.64% | -24.51% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.76% | -33.74% | +13.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.81% | -8.90% | +4.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -12.84% | +9.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 2.49% | -1.23% |
Volatility
BAICX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) is 2.26%, while iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that BAICX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAICX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 4.24% | -1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.69% | 9.08% | -5.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.19% | 18.06% | -11.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 16.84% | -10.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.99% | 17.98% | -11.99% |