PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAICX vs. TRIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAICX vs. TRIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) and Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund (TRIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAICX achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly lower than TRIFX's 5.31% return. Over the past 10 years, BAICX has underperformed TRIFX with an annualized return of 4.98%, while TRIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.09% annualized return.


BAICX

1D
0.47%
1M
0.00%
6M
2.63%
YTD
4.16%
1Y
8.51%
3Y*
9.31%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
4.98%
ALL TIME*
5.14%

TRIFX

1D
1.46%
1M
1.08%
6M
3.51%
YTD
5.31%
1Y
9.42%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
8.09%
ALL TIME*
2.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BAICX vs. TRIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAICX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio
4.16%11.53%7.19%9.24%-12.42%6.61%6.34%13.61%-3.78%8.79%
TRIFX
Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund
5.31%5.53%10.63%14.49%-12.48%24.45%5.12%19.43%-7.19%12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BAICX and TRIFX is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2008

0.71

The correlation between BAICX and TRIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAICX vs. TRIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BAICX
BAICX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BAICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAICX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BAICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAICX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

TRIFX
TRIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TRIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BAICX vs. TRIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) and Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund (TRIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAICXTRIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.17

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.48

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

3.51

+4.22

BAICX vs. TRIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAICX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the TRIFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAICX and TRIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAICX vs. TRIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAICX drawdown since its inception was -33.29%, smaller than the maximum TRIFX drawdown of -54.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAICX and TRIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAICXTRIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.29%

-54.53%

+21.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.00%

-7.34%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.73%

-15.67%

+9.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.64%

-20.76%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.76%

-35.43%

+15.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-1.67%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-18.06%

+14.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

3.09%

-1.92%

Volatility

BAICX vs. TRIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) is 1.49%, while Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund (TRIFX) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that BAICX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAICXTRIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

2.46%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.79%

7.85%

-3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.63%

11.60%

-5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.33%

10.72%

-4.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

11.66%

-5.60%

BAICX vs. TRIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAICX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than TRIFX's 1.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAICX vs. TRIFX - Dividend Comparison

BAICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, less than TRIFX's 6.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAICX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio
5.93%6.26%5.85%4.20%4.21%4.90%4.07%4.69%5.28%4.60%4.71%5.34%
TRIFX
Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund
6.06%4.90%7.36%5.42%4.84%5.15%5.44%5.36%7.10%6.47%6.14%10.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAICX and TRIFX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRIFX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to BAICX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAICX dropped -33.29% vs TRIFX's -54.53%.

BAICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAICX and TRIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer