BAICX vs. MXCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) and Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX).
BAICX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 7, 2008. MXCPX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Sep 29, 1999.
Performance
BAICX vs. MXCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAICX vs. MXCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio | -1.72% | 11.53% | 7.19% | 9.24% | -12.42% | 6.61% | 6.34% | 13.61% | -3.78% | 8.79% |
MXCPX Great-West Conservative Profile Fund | -0.90% | 8.19% | 4.95% | 8.41% | -10.33% | 6.35% | 8.07% | 11.40% | -3.95% | 5.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAICX achieves a -1.72% return, which is significantly lower than MXCPX's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, BAICX has outperformed MXCPX with an annualized return of 4.85%, while MXCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.62% annualized return.
BAICX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- -1.72%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 7.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.85%
MXCPX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 5.79%
- 3Y*
- 5.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.72%
- 10Y*
- 3.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAICX vs. MXCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAICX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than MXCPX's 0.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BAICX vs. MXCPX — Risk / Return Rank
BAICX
MXCPX
BAICX vs. MXCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) and Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAICX | MXCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.13 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.57 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.37 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | 5.54 | +0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAICX | MXCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.13 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.41 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.56 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.07 | +0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAICX and MXCPX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BAICX vs. MXCPX - Dividend Comparison
BAICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, more than MXCPX's 3.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio | 5.98% | 6.26% | 5.85% | 4.20% | 4.21% | 4.90% | 4.07% | 4.69% | 5.28% | 4.60% | 4.71% | 5.34% |
MXCPX Great-West Conservative Profile Fund | 3.49% | 3.45% | 4.53% | 4.17% | 5.70% | 5.20% | 2.46% | 5.62% | 5.53% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BAICX vs. MXCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAICX drawdown since its inception was -33.29%, roughly equal to the maximum MXCPX drawdown of -35.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAICX and MXCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAICX | MXCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.29% | -35.02% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.00% | -4.11% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.64% | -17.81% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.76% | -17.81% | -1.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.81% | -3.75% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -12.61% | +8.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 1.02% | +0.24% |
Volatility
BAICX vs. MXCPX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) at 1.97%. This indicates that BAICX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAICX | MXCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 1.97% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.69% | 3.19% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.19% | 5.27% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 6.68% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.99% | 6.49% | -0.50% |