BAICX vs. FAYZX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) and Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX).
BAICX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 7, 2008. FAYZX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 9, 2015.
Performance
BAICX vs. FAYZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAICX vs. FAYZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio | -1.72% | 11.53% | 7.19% | 9.24% | -12.42% | 6.61% | 6.34% | 13.61% | -3.78% | 8.79% |
FAYZX Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I | 0.32% | 14.13% | 9.59% | 11.73% | -13.69% | 17.17% | 16.39% | 23.15% | -3.01% | 6.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAICX achieves a -1.72% return, which is significantly lower than FAYZX's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, BAICX has underperformed FAYZX with an annualized return of 4.85%, while FAYZX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.62% annualized return.
BAICX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- -1.72%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 7.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.85%
FAYZX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -6.13%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 16.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.88%
- 10Y*
- 8.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAICX vs. FAYZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAICX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FAYZX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BAICX vs. FAYZX — Risk / Return Rank
BAICX
FAYZX
BAICX vs. FAYZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) and Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAICX | FAYZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.46 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.99 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.28 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.05 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | 7.74 | -1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAICX | FAYZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.46 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.61 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.89 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.89 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAICX and FAYZX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BAICX vs. FAYZX - Dividend Comparison
BAICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, more than FAYZX's 3.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio | 5.98% | 6.26% | 5.85% | 4.20% | 4.21% | 4.90% | 4.07% | 4.69% | 5.28% | 4.60% | 4.71% | 5.34% |
FAYZX Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I | 3.49% | 3.77% | 3.51% | 4.21% | 3.73% | 2.79% | 3.27% | 2.82% | 2.96% | 3.34% | 8.29% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BAICX vs. FAYZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAICX drawdown since its inception was -33.29%, which is greater than FAYZX's maximum drawdown of -21.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAICX and FAYZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAICX | FAYZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.29% | -21.64% | -11.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.00% | -7.94% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.64% | -18.13% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.76% | -21.64% | +1.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.81% | -6.47% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -3.45% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 2.10% | -0.84% |
Volatility
BAICX vs. FAYZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) is 2.26%, while Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that BAICX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAYZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAICX | FAYZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 3.97% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.69% | 7.99% | -4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.19% | 11.84% | -5.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 9.77% | -3.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.99% | 9.76% | -3.77% |