FAYZX vs. FASMX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FAYZX (Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I) and FASMX (Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FAYZX returned 9.02%/yr vs 7.83%/yr for FASMX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAYZX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FASMX.

Performance

FAYZX vs. FASMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAYZX achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly lower than FASMX's 9.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FAYZX has outperformed FASMX with an annualized return of 9.02%, while FASMX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.83% annualized return.

FAYZX

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 7.19%
• 6M: 6.64%
• 1Y: 18.62%
• 3Y*: 12.03%
• 5Y*: 6.42%
• 10Y*: 9.02%

FASMX

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: 1.80%
• YTD: 9.17%
• 6M: 9.26%
• 1Y: 20.25%
• 3Y*: 12.59%
• 5Y*: 6.48%
• 10Y*: 7.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAYZX vs. FASMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAYZX Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I	7.19%	14.13%	9.59%	11.73%	-13.69%	17.17%	16.39%	23.15%	-3.01%	6.21%
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund	9.17%	14.94%	8.46%	13.09%	-14.93%	9.86%	14.72%	18.25%	-5.51%	11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FAYZX and FASMX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.88

The correlation between FAYZX and FASMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FAYZX vs. FASMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAYZX

FAYZX Risk / Return Rank: 44
FAYZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FAYZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FAYZX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FAYZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FAYZX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FASMX

FASMX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FASMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FASMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FASMX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FASMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FASMX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAYZX vs. FASMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAYZX	FASMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	2.37	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	3.34	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.46	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	3.25	-0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.25	13.91	-4.66

FAYZX vs. FASMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAYZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the FASMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAYZX and FASMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAYZX vs. FASMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAYZX drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, smaller than the maximum FASMX drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAYZX and FASMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAYZX	FASMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.64%	-37.75%	+16.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-6.19%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.18%	-9.28%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.13%	-20.54%	+2.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.64%	-21.27%	-0.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	0.00%	-1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.40%	-4.11%	+0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	1.44%	+0.52%

Volatility

FAYZX vs. FASMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) at 3.64%. This indicates that FAYZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAYZX	FASMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	3.64%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.16%	7.21%	+0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.57%	8.50%	+2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.94%	9.42%	+0.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.90%	9.36%	+0.54%

FAYZX vs. FASMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAYZX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FASMX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAYZX vs. FASMX - Dividend Comparison

FAYZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than FASMX's 6.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund	6.92%	7.58%	3.88%	2.18%	6.78%	2.91%	2.40%	4.21%	5.11%	2.24%	1.69%	5.77%
FAYZX Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I	3.47%	3.77%	3.51%	4.21%	3.73%	2.79%	3.27%	2.82%	2.96%	3.34%	8.29%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAYZX and FASMX in my portfolio?

FAYZX and FASMX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAYZX or FASMX?

FAYZX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to FASMX (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAYZX dropped -21.64% vs FASMX's -37.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.