PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAI vs. PXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BAI vs. PXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) and Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BAI vs. PXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BAI
iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF
-1.05%25.22%8.06%
PXQ
Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF
3.66%28.65%1.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAI achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than PXQ's 3.66% return.


BAI

1D
5.71%
1M
-5.88%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
-1.80%
1Y
53.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PXQ

1D
3.38%
1M
-6.68%
YTD
3.66%
6M
9.60%
1Y
39.27%
3Y*
23.01%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
16.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAI vs. PXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PXQ's 0.63% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BAI vs. PXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAI
BAI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PXQ
PXQ Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAI vs. PXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) and Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAIPXQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.54

1.70

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

2.39

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.03

+0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.33

14.17

-5.83

BAI vs. PXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the PXQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAI and PXQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAIPXQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.70

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.48

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between BAI and PXQ is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BAI vs. PXQ - Dividend Comparison

BAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than PXQ's 0.90% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BAI
iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF
1.81%1.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PXQ
Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF
0.90%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%

Drawdowns

BAI vs. PXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAI drawdown since its inception was -34.09%, smaller than the maximum PXQ drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAI and PXQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BAIPXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.09%

-57.18%

+23.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.22%

-12.94%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.44%

-6.94%

-4.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-10.82%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.17%

2.76%

+3.41%

Volatility

BAI vs. PXQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) has a higher volatility of 14.66% compared to Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ) at 8.61%. This indicates that BAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BAIPXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.66%

8.61%

+6.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.45%

15.47%

+9.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.89%

23.27%

+11.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.51%

22.86%

+11.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.51%

22.72%

+11.79%