PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAH vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAH vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAH achieves a -6.24% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, BAH has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 12.25%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.


BAH

1D
-2.28%
1M
0.85%
YTD
-6.24%
6M
-4.11%
1Y
-23.32%
3Y*
-7.18%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
12.25%

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAH vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
-6.24%-33.02%2.00%24.47%25.71%-1.04%24.46%60.16%20.21%7.77%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BAH and TQQQ is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2010

0.35

The correlation between BAH and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAH vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAH
BAH Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAH Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAH Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAH vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAHTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.40

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

3.75

-4.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.05

12.27

-13.32

BAH vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAH Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAH and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAHTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.62

2.92

-3.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.43

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.69

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.74

-0.17

Drawdowns

BAH vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAH drawdown since its inception was -60.24%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAH and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAHTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.24%

-81.66%

+21.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.07%

-36.97%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.24%

-58.04%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.24%

-81.66%

+21.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.24%

-81.66%

+21.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.40%

-0.76%

-55.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.68%

-18.52%

+7.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.20%

11.28%

+10.92%

Volatility

BAH vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is 12.40%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that BAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAHTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.40%

13.29%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.84%

36.04%

-4.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.82%

47.60%

-9.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.00%

66.53%

-35.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.65%

65.96%

-37.31%

Dividends

BAH vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
2.85%2.61%1.59%1.47%1.65%1.75%1.42%1.35%1.69%1.78%1.66%1.69%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAH and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to BAH (12.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAH dropped -60.24% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAH and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer