PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAH vs. RHM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAH vs. RHM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BAH is traded in USD, while RHM.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the RHM.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAH achieves a -5.07% return, which is significantly higher than RHM.DE's -23.89% return. Over the past 10 years, BAH has underperformed RHM.DE with an annualized return of 12.45%, while RHM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 37.93% annualized return.


BAH

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.17%
YTD
-5.07%
6M
-9.00%
1Y
-21.11%
3Y*
-6.67%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*
12.45%

RHM.DE

1D
-0.74%
1M
-2.80%
YTD
-23.89%
6M
-21.63%
1Y
-31.48%
3Y*
77.59%
5Y*
69.25%
10Y*
37.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAH vs. RHM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
-5.07%-33.02%2.00%24.47%25.71%-1.04%24.46%60.16%20.21%7.77%
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG
-23.89%188.18%104.13%61.77%115.57%-9.52%0.05%32.69%-29.51%92.32%

Correlation

The correlation between BAH and RHM.DE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2010

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAH vs. RHM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAH
BAH Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAH Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAH Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

RHM.DE
RHM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RHM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
RHM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAH vs. RHM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAHRHM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.90

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

-0.76

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.91

-1.73

+0.82

BAH vs. RHM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAH Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is comparable to the RHM.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAH and RHM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAHRHM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.54

-0.72

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

1.59

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.97

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.43

+0.14

Drawdowns

BAH vs. RHM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAH drawdown since its inception was -60.24%, smaller than the maximum RHM.DE drawdown of -78.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAH and RHM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAHRHM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.24%

-78.19%

+17.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.07%

-43.61%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.24%

-43.61%

-16.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.24%

-43.61%

-16.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.24%

-66.25%

+6.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.85%

-40.14%

-15.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-23.65%

+12.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.35%

19.15%

+3.20%

Volatility

BAH vs. RHM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is 12.36%, while Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) has a volatility of 16.73%. This indicates that BAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RHM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAHRHM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.36%

16.73%

-4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.87%

34.52%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.77%

46.07%

-8.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.00%

42.83%

-11.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.66%

38.83%

-10.17%

Dividends

BAH vs. RHM.DE - Dividend Comparison

BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than RHM.DE's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
2.82%2.61%1.59%1.47%1.65%1.75%1.42%1.35%1.69%1.78%1.66%1.69%
RHM.DE
Rheinmetall AG
0.97%0.52%0.93%1.50%1.77%2.41%5.54%2.05%2.20%1.37%1.72%0.49%

Financials

BAH vs. RHM.DE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Rheinmetall AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. BAH values in USD, RHM.DE values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


BAH and RHM.DE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAH and RHM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer