PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAGSX vs. BSGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAGSX vs. BSGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Baird Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (BSGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAGSX achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than BSGSX's 6.61% return.


BAGSX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.33%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
1.74%

BSGSX

1D
1.42%
1M
2.69%
YTD
6.61%
6M
3.40%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
2.49%
5Y*
-1.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAGSX vs. BSGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BAGSX
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund
0.30%7.11%1.63%6.12%-13.52%-1.74%8.42%9.17%2.40%
BSGSX
Baird Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
6.61%-8.97%7.56%10.60%-27.31%18.01%46.76%36.69%-11.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BAGSX and BSGSX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018

0.09

Over the past year, BAGSX and BSGSX have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAGSX vs. BSGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAGSX
BAGSX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BAGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BAGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BSGSX
BSGSX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BSGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BSGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAGSX vs. BSGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Baird Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (BSGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAGSXBSGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.07

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

0.42

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.53

1.41

+4.12

BAGSX vs. BSGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the BSGSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAGSX and BSGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAGSXBSGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

0.34

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

-0.05

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.33

+0.59

Drawdowns

BAGSX vs. BSGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAGSX drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum BSGSX drawdown of -36.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAGSX and BSGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAGSXBSGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.97%

-36.33%

+17.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-13.63%

+10.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.17%

-25.57%

+19.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.84%

-36.33%

+17.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-21.02%

+19.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-16.46%

+13.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

4.02%

-3.06%

Volatility

BAGSX vs. BSGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) is 1.29%, while Baird Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (BSGSX) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that BAGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAGSXBSGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

4.87%

-3.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.68%

13.24%

-10.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78%

16.93%

-13.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.93%

21.63%

-15.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.89%

23.46%

-18.57%

BAGSX vs. BSGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAGSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BSGSX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAGSX vs. BSGSX - Dividend Comparison

BAGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, while BSGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAGSX
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund
3.80%3.69%3.62%3.10%2.33%1.68%3.02%2.41%2.53%2.21%1.96%2.14%
BSGSX
Baird Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.69%3.14%3.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAGSX and BSGSX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSGSX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to BAGSX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAGSX dropped -18.97% vs BSGSX's -36.33%.

BAGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAGSX and BSGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer