PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAGSX vs. BCOSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAGSX vs. BCOSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Baird Core Plus Bond Fund (BCOSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAGSX achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than BCOSX's 0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, BAGSX has underperformed BCOSX with an annualized return of 1.74%, while BCOSX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.15% annualized return.


BAGSX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.33%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
1.74%

BCOSX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.42%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
2.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAGSX vs. BCOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAGSX
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund
0.30%7.11%1.63%6.12%-13.52%-1.74%8.42%9.17%-0.55%3.90%
BCOSX
Baird Core Plus Bond Fund
0.41%7.22%2.26%6.60%-13.09%-1.23%8.59%9.69%-0.74%4.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BAGSX and BCOSX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000

0.96

The correlation between BAGSX and BCOSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAGSX vs. BCOSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAGSX
BAGSX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BAGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BAGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BCOSX
BCOSX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BCOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAGSX vs. BCOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Baird Core Plus Bond Fund (BCOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAGSXBCOSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.10

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.53

6.18

-0.65

BAGSX vs. BCOSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the BCOSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAGSX and BCOSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAGSXBCOSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.50

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.10

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.46

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

1.02

-0.10

Drawdowns

BAGSX vs. BCOSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAGSX drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, roughly equal to the maximum BCOSX drawdown of -18.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAGSX and BCOSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAGSXBCOSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.97%

-18.39%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-2.58%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.17%

-5.80%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.84%

-18.39%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.97%

-18.39%

-0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-1.24%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-2.30%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.87%

+0.09%

Volatility

BAGSX vs. BCOSX - Volatility Comparison

Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Baird Core Plus Bond Fund (BCOSX) have volatilities of 1.29% and 1.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAGSXBCOSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

1.23%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.68%

2.55%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78%

3.62%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.93%

5.62%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.89%

4.65%

+0.24%

BAGSX vs. BCOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BAGSX and BCOSX have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Dividends

BAGSX vs. BCOSX - Dividend Comparison

BAGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than BCOSX's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAGSX
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund
3.80%3.69%3.62%3.10%2.33%1.68%3.02%2.41%2.53%2.21%1.96%2.14%
BCOSX
Baird Core Plus Bond Fund
3.87%3.75%3.68%3.17%2.69%2.57%3.11%2.60%2.75%2.47%2.27%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BAGSX and BCOSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BAGSX has higher volatility (1.29%) compared to BCOSX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAGSX dropped -18.97% vs BCOSX's -18.39%.

BCOSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAGSX and BCOSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer