PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAFWX vs. BIASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAFWX vs. BIASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) and Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAFWX achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly lower than BIASX's 10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, BAFWX has outperformed BIASX with an annualized return of 15.79%, while BIASX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.21% annualized return.


BAFWX

1D
-0.16%
1M
9.41%
YTD
7.08%
6M
6.03%
1Y
10.33%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
15.79%

BIASX

1D
0.14%
1M
4.85%
YTD
10.70%
6M
10.52%
1Y
16.57%
3Y*
7.69%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAFWX vs. BIASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAFWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares
7.08%3.35%20.35%39.07%-30.90%30.01%39.09%36.09%4.51%28.10%
BIASX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund
10.70%2.29%4.29%12.43%-20.27%7.31%31.78%36.26%-4.47%16.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BAFWX and BIASX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.82

The correlation between BAFWX and BIASX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAFWX vs. BIASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAFWX
BAFWX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BAFWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAFWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAFWX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BAFWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAFWX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BIASX
BIASX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BIASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIASX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
BIASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIASX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAFWX vs. BIASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) and Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAFWXBIASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.19

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

1.69

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.41

6.00

-4.59

BAFWX vs. BIASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAFWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the BIASX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAFWX and BIASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAFWXBIASXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

1.08

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.08

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.46

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.30

+0.50

Drawdowns

BAFWX vs. BIASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAFWX drawdown since its inception was -36.86%, smaller than the maximum BIASX drawdown of -73.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAFWX and BIASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAFWXBIASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.86%

-73.26%

+36.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.93%

-10.93%

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.03%

-24.98%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.86%

-30.61%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.86%

-38.04%

+1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.33%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-23.48%

+17.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.64%

3.07%

+4.57%

Volatility

BAFWX vs. BIASX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) and Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) have volatilities of 4.49% and 4.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAFWXBIASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

4.55%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

12.44%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.55%

17.07%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.62%

19.79%

+2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

19.94%

+1.57%

BAFWX vs. BIASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAFWX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than BIASX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAFWX vs. BIASX - Dividend Comparison

BAFWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.26%, more than BIASX's 17.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAFWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares
22.26%23.83%5.23%0.01%0.00%1.82%0.00%1.48%3.71%1.70%0.71%4.73%
BIASX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund
17.72%19.62%5.78%0.00%8.22%13.22%0.78%4.00%5.17%1.69%3.50%16.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAFWX and BIASX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIASX has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to BAFWX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAFWX dropped -36.86% vs BIASX's -73.26%.

BIASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAFWX and BIASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer