BAFWX vs. ^GSPC
Compare and contrast key facts about Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC).
BAFWX is managed by Brown Advisory Funds. It was launched on Jun 29, 2012.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BAFWX or ^GSPC.
Key characteristics
| BAFWX | ^GSPC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 21.93% | 24.72% |
| 1Y Return | 30.72% | 32.12% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.59% | 8.33% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.50% | 13.81% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.77% | 11.31% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.89 | 2.66 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.58 | 3.56 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.35 | 1.50 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.12 | 3.81 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.17 | 17.03 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.53% | 1.90% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.27% | 12.16% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.99% | -56.78% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.81% | -0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAFWX and ^GSPC is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BAFWX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BAFWX achieves a 21.93% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 24.72% return. Over the past 10 years, BAFWX has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 14.77%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.31% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BAFWX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
BAFWX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAFWX drawdown since its inception was -37.99%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAFWX and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BAFWX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 3.81%. This indicates that BAFWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.