PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAFE vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAFE vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAFE achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 9.41% return.


BAFE

1D
-0.93%
1M
1.39%
YTD
5.32%
6M
4.99%
1Y
14.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.15%
YTD
9.41%
6M
8.89%
1Y
26.13%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAFE vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BAFE
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF
5.32%9.80%-0.51%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
9.41%17.77%0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BAFE and BBUS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024

0.91

The correlation between BAFE and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAFE vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAFE
BAFE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAFE vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAFEBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.38

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

2.85

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

12.65

-8.65

BAFE vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAFE Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAFE and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAFE vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAFE drawdown since its inception was -18.37%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAFE and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAFEBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.37%

-35.35%

+16.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.73%

-9.21%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.82%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-5.43%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

2.07%

+1.49%

Volatility

BAFE vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAFEBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

4.70%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.52%

9.81%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

12.49%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

17.12%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.51%

19.59%

-2.08%

BAFE vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAFE has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAFE vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

BAFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than BBUS's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BAFE
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF
0.28%0.30%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.99%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAFE and BBUS have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBUS has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to BAFE (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAFE dropped -18.37% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 1-year performance, BBUS leads with 26.13% vs 14.24% for BAFE. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BAFE has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 26.13% return vs 14.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for BAFE.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.28% for BAFE.

They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for BAFE and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAFE and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer