PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAESY vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAESY vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAESY achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly higher than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, BAESY has outperformed T with an annualized return of 18.72%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.


BAESY

1D
-4.00%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
11.25%
6M
13.51%
1Y
0.44%
3Y*
30.63%
5Y*
30.61%
10Y*
18.72%

T

1D
2.52%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
-12.96%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
3.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAESY vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
11.25%65.51%1.23%40.91%46.40%14.56%-3.43%34.69%-22.16%13.28%
T
AT&T Inc.
-2.96%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BAESY and T is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.24

The correlation between BAESY and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BAESY:

£5.29

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

BAESY:

14.41

T:

7.74

PEG Ratio

BAESY:

2.65

T:

0.32

PS Ratio

BAESY:

1.06

T:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAESY:

£54.56B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAESY:

£19.72B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAESY:

£7.74B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAESY vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAESY
BAESY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BAESY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAESY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAESY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BAESY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAESY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAESY vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAESYTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.92

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

-0.59

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.04

-1.22

+1.26

BAESY vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAESY Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAESY and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAESY vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAESY drawdown since its inception was -59.20%, smaller than the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAESY and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAESYTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.20%

-64.15%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.59%

-21.87%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.59%

-21.87%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.59%

-32.01%

+8.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.13%

-42.35%

+0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.92%

-18.12%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.32%

-15.72%

-3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.17%

10.64%

-0.47%

Volatility

BAESY vs. T - Volatility Comparison

BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 8.21%. This indicates that BAESY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAESYTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

8.21%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.10%

17.80%

+7.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.92%

22.13%

+9.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.12%

24.01%

+4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.90%

23.73%

+4.17%

Dividends

BAESY vs. T - Dividend Comparison

BAESY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than T's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
1.90%1.90%2.79%2.40%3.09%4.46%7.05%3.66%4.93%5.71%6.26%4.38%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.71%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

BAESY vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAE Systems PLC and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20212022202320242025
14.67B
33.47B
(BAESY) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BAESY values in GBP, T values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BAESY and T have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAESY has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to T (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAESY dropped -59.20% vs T's -64.15%.

BAESY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAESY and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer