PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAESY vs. NTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAESY vs. NTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAESY achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly higher than NTR's 10.35% return.


BAESY

1D
-4.00%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
11.25%
6M
13.51%
1Y
0.44%
3Y*
30.63%
5Y*
30.61%
10Y*
18.72%

NTR

1D
3.14%
1M
-5.15%
YTD
10.35%
6M
9.34%
1Y
15.83%
3Y*
7.94%
5Y*
4.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAESY vs. NTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
11.25%65.51%1.23%40.91%46.40%14.56%-3.43%34.69%-22.16%
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
10.35%43.33%-16.97%-20.19%0.23%60.78%5.60%5.57%-7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BAESY and NTR is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018

0.23

The correlation between BAESY and NTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAESY:

$77.52B

NTR:

$32.57B

EPS

BAESY:

£5.29

NTR:

$4.93

PE Ratio

BAESY:

14.41

NTR:

13.72

PEG Ratio

BAESY:

2.65

NTR:

0.20

PS Ratio

BAESY:

1.06

NTR:

1.18

PB Ratio

BAESY:

4.92

NTR:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAESY:

£54.56B

NTR:

$27.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAESY:

£19.72B

NTR:

$8.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAESY:

£7.74B

NTR:

$6.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAESY vs. NTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAESY
BAESY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BAESY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAESY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAESY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BAESY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAESY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

NTR
NTR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAESY vs. NTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAESYNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.11

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

0.72

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.04

1.87

-1.83

BAESY vs. NTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAESY Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the NTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAESY and NTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAESY vs. NTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAESY drawdown since its inception was -59.20%, roughly equal to the maximum NTR drawdown of -57.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAESY and NTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAESYNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.20%

-57.80%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.59%

-21.97%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.59%

-32.82%

+9.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.59%

-57.80%

+34.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.92%

-31.34%

+14.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.32%

-26.17%

+6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.17%

8.49%

+1.68%

Volatility

BAESY vs. NTR - Volatility Comparison

BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) at 6.45%. This indicates that BAESY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAESYNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

6.45%

+4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.10%

25.79%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.92%

31.82%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.12%

34.21%

-6.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.90%

33.99%

-6.09%

Dividends

BAESY vs. NTR - Dividend Comparison

BAESY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than NTR's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
1.90%1.90%2.79%2.40%3.09%4.46%7.05%3.66%4.93%5.71%6.26%4.38%
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
3.23%3.53%4.83%3.76%3.51%2.45%3.74%3.67%3.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BAESY vs. NTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAE Systems PLC and Nutrien Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B202120222023202420252026
14.67B
5.96B
(BAESY) Total Revenue
(NTR) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BAESY values in GBP, NTR values in USD

BAESY vs. NTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BAE Systems PLC and Nutrien Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%202120222023202420252026
9.2%
27.2%
Portfolio components
BAESY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.

NTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 5.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.

BAESY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

NTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported an operating income of 419.11M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

BAESY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

NTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a net income of 129.19M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAESY and NTR have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAESY has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to NTR (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAESY dropped -59.20% vs NTR's -57.80%.

NTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAESY and NTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer