PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAESY vs. LLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAESY vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAESY achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly higher than LLY's 5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, BAESY has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 18.72%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 33.45% annualized return.


BAESY

1D
-4.00%
1M
3.73%
YTD
11.25%
6M
13.51%
1Y
-1.39%
3Y*
30.63%
5Y*
30.61%
10Y*
18.72%

LLY

1D
-2.41%
1M
12.75%
YTD
5.78%
6M
10.64%
1Y
39.26%
3Y*
37.45%
5Y*
39.59%
10Y*
33.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAESY vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
11.25%65.51%1.23%40.91%46.40%14.56%-3.43%34.69%-22.16%13.28%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
5.78%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BAESY and LLY is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAESY:

$77.52B

LLY:

$1.02T

EPS

BAESY:

£5.29

LLY:

$28.14

PE Ratio

BAESY:

14.41

LLY:

40.26

PEG Ratio

BAESY:

2.65

LLY:

0.81

PS Ratio

BAESY:

1.06

LLY:

14.08

PB Ratio

BAESY:

4.92

LLY:

32.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAESY:

£54.56B

LLY:

$72.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAESY:

£19.72B

LLY:

$59.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAESY:

£7.74B

LLY:

$32.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAESY vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAESY
BAESY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BAESY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAESY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAESY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BAESY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAESY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAESY vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAESYLLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.22

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

1.72

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.04

4.28

-4.24

BAESY vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAESY Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAESY and LLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAESY vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAESY drawdown since its inception was -59.20%, smaller than the maximum LLY drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAESY and LLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAESYLLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.20%

-68.24%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.59%

-23.64%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.59%

-34.48%

+10.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.59%

-34.48%

+10.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.13%

-34.48%

-7.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.92%

-2.41%

-14.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.32%

-19.21%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.17%

9.49%

+0.68%

Volatility

BAESY vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 9.27%. This indicates that BAESY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAESYLLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

9.27%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.10%

27.16%

-2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.92%

38.01%

-6.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.12%

32.46%

-4.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.90%

30.19%

-2.29%

Dividends

BAESY vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

BAESY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than LLY's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
1.90%1.90%2.79%2.40%3.09%4.46%7.05%3.66%4.93%5.71%6.26%4.38%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.57%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%

Financials

BAESY vs. LLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAE Systems PLC and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B18.00B20.00B202120222023202420252026
14.67B
19.80B
(BAESY) Total Revenue
(LLY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BAESY values in GBP, LLY values in USD

BAESY vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BAE Systems PLC and Eli Lilly and Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202120222023202420252026
9.2%
79.0%
Portfolio components
BAESY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.

LLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

BAESY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

LLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.

BAESY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

LLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAESY and LLY have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAESY has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to LLY (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAESY dropped -59.20% vs LLY's -68.24%.

LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAESY and LLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer