BACIX vs. FMGIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BACIX (BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund) and FMGIX (Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund) are both mutual funds - BACIX is a Energy Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while FMGIX is a Infrastructure Equities fund managed by Frontier. Over the past 10 years, BACIX returned 9.63%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for FMGIX. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BACIX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FMGIX.

Performance

BACIX vs. FMGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BACIX achieves a 34.01% return, which is significantly higher than FMGIX's 7.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BACIX having a 9.63% annualized return and FMGIX not far ahead at 9.66%.

BACIX

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 11.72%
• 6M: 20.90%
• YTD: 34.01%
• 1Y: 42.86%
• 3Y*: 15.98%
• 5Y*: 22.04%
• 10Y*: 9.63%
• ALL TIME*: 6.10%

FMGIX

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -1.99%
• 6M: 4.72%
• YTD: 7.95%
• 1Y: 12.26%
• 3Y*: 21.86%
• 5Y*: 11.97%
• 10Y*: 9.66%
• ALL TIME*: 10.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BACIX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FMGIX Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BACIX vs. FMGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BACIX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund	34.01%	11.03%	4.23%	2.97%	43.64%	43.50%	-29.38%	13.04%	-19.55%	2.47%
FMGIX Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund	7.95%	22.67%	34.26%	4.86%	-9.46%	13.84%	-1.36%	28.00%	-6.62%	20.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BACIX and FMGIX is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2012	0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between BACIX and FMGIX has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BACIX vs. FMGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BACIX

BACIX Risk / Return Rank: 82
BACIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
BACIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
BACIX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
BACIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BACIX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FMGIX

FMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 36
FMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BACIX vs. FMGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BACIX	FMGIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	1.23	+1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	1.69	+1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.22	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	1.83	+1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.31	5.04	+4.27

BACIX vs. FMGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BACIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the FMGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BACIX and FMGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BACIX vs. FMGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BACIX drawdown since its inception was -77.81%, which is greater than FMGIX's maximum drawdown of -57.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BACIX and FMGIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BACIX	FMGIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.81%	-57.57%	-20.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.24%	-7.11%	-6.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.44%	-20.56%	+2.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.76%	-26.61%	+0.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.65%	-57.57%	-8.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.16%	-4.15%	+1.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.17%	-5.31%	-26.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.45%	2.58%	+1.87%

Volatility

BACIX vs. FMGIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) at 3.13%. This indicates that BACIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BACIX	FMGIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.77%	3.13%	+2.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.76%	9.04%	+5.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.98%	10.59%	+7.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.33%	28.52%	-5.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.13%	52.57%	-25.44%

BACIX vs. FMGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BACIX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FMGIX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BACIX vs. FMGIX - Dividend Comparison

BACIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than FMGIX's 30.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BACIX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund	2.03%	2.79%	2.63%	3.39%	2.49%	2.67%	3.66%	3.06%	3.43%	2.76%	2.38%	2.51%
FMGIX Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund	30.88%	33.65%	48.77%	4.79%	3.98%	2.63%	2.38%	2.63%	3.09%	3.15%	2.83%	2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BACIX and FMGIX in my portfolio?

BACIX and FMGIX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BACIX or FMGIX?

BACIX has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to FMGIX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BACIX dropped -77.81% vs FMGIX's -57.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BACIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.