BACHY vs. CCO.TO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BACHY (Bank of China Ltd ADR) and CCO.TO (Cameco Corporation) are both stocks. BACHY operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while CCO.TO operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 10 years, BACHY returned 13.27%/yr vs 27.32%/yr for CCO.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BACHY vs. CCO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bank of China Ltd ADR (BACHY) and Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BACHY is traded in USD, while CCO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CCO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BACHY achieves a 17.86% return, which is significantly lower than CCO.TO's 31.75% return. Over the past 10 years, BACHY has underperformed CCO.TO with an annualized return of 13.27%, while CCO.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 27.32% annualized return.

BACHY

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 3.82%
• YTD: 17.86%
• 6M: 15.07%
• 1Y: 20.61%
• 3Y*: 29.74%
• 5Y*: 20.81%
• 10Y*: 13.27%

CCO.TO

• 1D: 7.11%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 31.75%
• 6M: 36.57%
• 1Y: 107.92%
• 3Y*: 59.21%
• 5Y*: 42.25%
• 10Y*: 27.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BACHY vs. CCO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BACHY Bank of China Ltd ADR	17.86%	23.87%	43.09%	14.58%	10.54%	14.31%	-14.46%	4.65%	-8.11%	15.60%
CCO.TO Cameco Corporation	31.75%	78.54%	19.38%	90.76%	4.23%	63.38%	51.62%	-21.22%	23.59%	-8.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BACHY and CCO.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2009	0.27

The correlation between BACHY and CCO.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap BACHY : $198.18B CCO.TO : CA$72.69B
EPS BACHY : $19.38 CCO.TO : CA$1.49
PE Ratio BACHY : 0.87 CCO.TO : 111.70
PEG Ratio BACHY : 0.72 CCO.TO : 0.93
PS Ratio BACHY : 0.17 CCO.TO : 20.54
PB Ratio BACHY : 0.07 CCO.TO : 10.29
Total Revenue (TTM) BACHY : $1.22T CCO.TO : CA$3.54B
Gross Profit (TTM) BACHY : $635.71B CCO.TO : CA$1.13B
EBITDA (TTM) BACHY : $307.28B CCO.TO : CA$818.74M

Return for Risk

BACHY vs. CCO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BACHY

BACHY Risk / Return Rank: 71
BACHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
BACHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
BACHY Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BACHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BACHY Martin Ratio Rank: 71

CCO.TO

CCO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
CCO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CCO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CCO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CCO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CCO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BACHY vs. CCO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of China Ltd ADR (BACHY) and Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BACHY	CCO.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.99	-0.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	2.75	-0.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.33	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	4.15	-2.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.10	9.51	-5.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BACHY vs. CCO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BACHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the CCO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BACHY and CCO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BACHY	CCO.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	1.99	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.07	0.86	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	0.59	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.26	+0.16

Drawdowns

BACHY vs. CCO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BACHY drawdown since its inception was -53.68%, smaller than the maximum CCO.TO drawdown of -85.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BACHY and CCO.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BACHY	CCO.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.68%	-85.07%	+31.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.43%	-25.69%	+12.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.70%	-40.08%	+24.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.91%	-40.08%	+23.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.98%	-57.34%	+16.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-9.95%	+9.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.89%	-44.68%	+24.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.65%	11.23%	-6.58%

Volatility

BACHY vs. CCO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bank of China Ltd ADR (BACHY) is 4.52%, while Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) has a volatility of 15.09%. This indicates that BACHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BACHY	CCO.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	15.09%	-10.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.56%	37.49%	-24.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.18%	54.55%	-37.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.61%	49.61%	-30.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.62%	46.64%	-26.02%

Dividends

BACHY vs. CCO.TO - Dividend Comparison

BACHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than CCO.TO's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BACHY Bank of China Ltd ADR	2.28%	8.52%	6.46%	8.92%	9.64%	8.57%	7.99%	5.32%	5.42%	4.08%	11.53%	7.39%
CCO.TO Cameco Corporation	0.14%	0.19%	0.22%	0.21%	0.39%	0.29%	0.47%	0.69%	0.52%	3.45%	2.85%	2.34%

Financials

BACHY vs. CCO.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bank of China Ltd ADR and Cameco Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BACHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of China Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 143.17B and revenue of 311.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.9%.

CCO.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 290.25M and revenue of 845.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.

BACHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of China Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 74.31B and revenue of 311.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

CCO.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 153.89M and revenue of 845.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

BACHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of China Ltd ADR reported a net income of 56.29B and revenue of 311.94B, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.

CCO.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 130.75M and revenue of 845.37M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BACHY and CCO.TO in my portfolio?

BACHY and CCO.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.