BACHY vs. CVS
BACHY (Bank of China Ltd ADR) and CVS (CVS Health Corporation) are both stocks. BACHY operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while CVS operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, BACHY returned 12.70%/yr vs 4.02%/yr for CVS. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BACHY vs. CVS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BACHY achieves a 16.57% return, which is significantly lower than CVS's 35.72% return. Over the past 10 years, BACHY has outperformed CVS with an annualized return of 12.70%, while CVS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.02% annualized return.
BACHY
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- 6M
- 16.41%
- YTD
- 16.57%
- 1Y
- 14.66%
- 3Y*
- 30.14%
- 5Y*
- 21.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
CVS
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- 6M
- 34.03%
- YTD
- 35.72%
- 1Y
- 69.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.68%
- 10Y*
- 4.02%
BACHY vs. CVS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BACHY Bank of China Ltd ADR | 16.57% | 23.87% | 43.09% | 14.58% | 10.54% | 14.31% | -14.46% | 4.65% | -8.11% | 15.60% |
CVS CVS Health Corporation | 35.72% | 84.35% | -40.77% | -12.53% | -7.63% | 54.87% | -5.14% | 17.26% | -7.04% | -5.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BACHY and CVS is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2009 | 0.21 |
The correlation between BACHY and CVS shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BACHY:
$202.49B
CVS:
$135.12B
BACHY:
CN¥19.10
CVS:
$2.30
BACHY:
5.74
CVS:
46.05
BACHY:
1.15
CVS:
0.33
BACHY:
0.47
CVS:
1.75
BACHY:
CN¥1.22T
CVS:
$407.91B
BACHY:
CN¥635.71B
CVS:
$56.59B
BACHY:
CN¥307.28B
CVS:
$9.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BACHY vs. CVS — Risk / Return Rank
BACHY
CVS
BACHY vs. CVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of China Ltd ADR (BACHY) and CVS Health Corporation (CVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BACHY | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.40 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 4.25 | -3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | 12.19 | -9.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BACHY vs. CVS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BACHY drawdown since its inception was -53.68%, smaller than the maximum CVS drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BACHY and CVS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BACHY | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.68% | -64.07% | +10.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.43% | -16.44% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.70% | -43.98% | +28.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.91% | -56.79% | +39.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.98% | -56.79% | +15.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.61% | 0.00% | -5.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.79% | -19.51% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.03% | 5.74% | -0.71% |
Volatility
BACHY vs. CVS - Volatility Comparison
Bank of China Ltd ADR (BACHY) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to CVS Health Corporation (CVS) at 7.04%. This indicates that BACHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BACHY | CVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.00% | 7.04% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.16% | 26.30% | -11.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.82% | 31.05% | -12.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.03% | 30.07% | -10.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 29.37% | -8.67% |
Dividends
BACHY vs. CVS - Dividend Comparison
BACHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than CVS's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BACHY Bank of China Ltd ADR | 5.04% | 8.52% | 6.46% | 8.92% | 9.64% | 8.57% | 7.99% | 5.32% | 5.42% | 4.08% | 11.53% | 7.39% |
CVS CVS Health Corporation | 2.51% | 3.35% | 5.93% | 3.06% | 2.36% | 1.94% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.76% | 2.15% | 1.43% |
Financials
BACHY vs. CVS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of China Ltd ADR and CVS Health Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BACHY vs. CVS - Profitability Comparison
BACHY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Bank of China Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 143.17B and revenue of 311.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.9%.
CVS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.62B and revenue of 100.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.6%.
BACHY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Bank of China Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 74.31B and revenue of 311.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.
CVS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported an operating income of 4.68B and revenue of 100.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.
BACHY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Bank of China Ltd ADR reported a net income of 56.29B and revenue of 311.94B, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.
CVS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported a net income of 2.94B and revenue of 100.43B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BACHY and CVS have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BACHY has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to CVS (7.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BACHY dropped -53.68% vs CVS's -64.07%.
CVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BACHY and CVS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer