BACAX vs. FMGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX).
BACAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Feb 16, 2005. FMGIX is managed by Frontier Funds. It was launched on Jan 17, 2012.
Performance
BACAX vs. FMGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BACAX vs. FMGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BACAX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund | 35.80% | 10.53% | 3.78% | 2.61% | 43.02% | 42.93% | -29.68% | 12.64% | -19.98% | 2.07% |
FMGIX Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund | 7.76% | 22.67% | 34.26% | 4.86% | -9.46% | 13.84% | -1.36% | 28.00% | -6.62% | 20.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BACAX achieves a 35.80% return, which is significantly higher than FMGIX's 7.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BACAX having a 10.05% annualized return and FMGIX not far ahead at 10.13%.
BACAX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 8.11%
- YTD
- 35.80%
- 6M
- 38.56%
- 1Y
- 37.54%
- 3Y*
- 18.29%
- 5Y*
- 21.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
FMGIX
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- 7.76%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- 1Y
- 20.98%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BACAX vs. FMGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BACAX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than FMGIX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BACAX vs. FMGIX — Risk / Return Rank
BACAX
FMGIX
BACAX vs. FMGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BACAX | FMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 1.82 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 2.33 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.82 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 10.60 | -3.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BACAX | FMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.82 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.47 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.19 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.24 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between BACAX and FMGIX is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BACAX vs. FMGIX - Dividend Comparison
BACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than FMGIX's 31.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BACAX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund | 1.82% | 2.47% | 2.29% | 3.06% | 2.21% | 2.39% | 3.38% | 2.69% | 2.87% | 2.48% | 1.95% | 1.98% |
FMGIX Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund | 31.20% | 33.65% | 48.77% | 4.79% | 3.98% | 2.63% | 2.38% | 2.63% | 3.09% | 3.15% | 2.83% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
BACAX vs. FMGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BACAX drawdown since its inception was -78.88%, which is greater than FMGIX's maximum drawdown of -57.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BACAX and FMGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BACAX | FMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.88% | -57.57% | -21.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.54% | -7.74% | -9.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -26.61% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.92% | -57.57% | -8.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -4.32% | +3.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.51% | -5.37% | -29.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.26% | 2.06% | +3.20% |
Volatility
BACAX vs. FMGIX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) have volatilities of 4.19% and 4.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BACAX | FMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 4.10% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 7.02% | +4.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.56% | 11.92% | +9.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 28.44% | -4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 52.56% | -25.39% |