BACAX vs. FKUTX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BACAX (BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund) and FKUTX (Franklin Utilities Fund) are both mutual funds - BACAX is a Energy Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while FKUTX is a Utilities Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, BACAX returned 7.56%/yr vs 9.55%/yr for FKUTX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BACAX charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for FKUTX.

Performance

BACAX vs. FKUTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BACAX achieves a 20.01% return, which is significantly higher than FKUTX's 7.60% return. Over the past 10 years, BACAX has underperformed FKUTX with an annualized return of 7.56%, while FKUTX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.55% annualized return.

BACAX

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: -8.93%
• YTD: 20.01%
• 6M: 21.58%
• 1Y: 23.93%
• 3Y*: 13.92%
• 5Y*: 17.93%
• 10Y*: 7.56%

FKUTX

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 7.60%
• 6M: 8.10%
• 1Y: 16.66%
• 3Y*: 15.16%
• 5Y*: 11.46%
• 10Y*: 9.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BACAX vs. FKUTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BACAX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund	20.01%	10.53%	3.78%	2.61%	43.02%	42.93%	-29.68%	12.64%	-19.98%	2.07%
FKUTX Franklin Utilities Fund	7.60%	14.59%	27.18%	-4.91%	1.67%	18.00%	-1.87%	27.28%	2.54%	9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BACAX and FKUTX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2005	0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between BACAX and FKUTX has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BACAX vs. FKUTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BACAX

BACAX Risk / Return Rank: 29
BACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
BACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
BACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
BACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

FKUTX

FKUTX Risk / Return Rank: 23
FKUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FKUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FKUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FKUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FKUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BACAX vs. FKUTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BACAX	FKUTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.21	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	1.67	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.21	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	2.11	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.15	5.09	+2.06

BACAX vs. FKUTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BACAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the FKUTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BACAX and FKUTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BACAX vs. FKUTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BACAX drawdown since its inception was -78.88%, which is greater than FKUTX's maximum drawdown of -43.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BACAX and FKUTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BACAX	FKUTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.88%	-43.59%	-35.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.36%	-8.10%	-4.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.73%	-16.35%	-2.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.74%	-22.53%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.92%	-36.56%	-29.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.36%	-4.90%	-7.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.21%	-7.00%	-27.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	3.35%	+0.16%

Volatility

BACAX vs. FKUTX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX) at 5.09%. This indicates that BACAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKUTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BACAX	FKUTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.09%	5.09%	+1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.58%	11.32%	+3.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.56%	14.06%	+3.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.56%	16.90%	+6.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.21%	18.85%	+8.36%

BACAX vs. FKUTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BACAX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than FKUTX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

BACAX vs. FKUTX - Dividend Comparison

BACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than FKUTX's 7.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BACAX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund	2.06%	2.47%	2.29%	3.06%	2.21%	2.39%	3.38%	2.69%	2.87%	2.48%	1.95%	1.98%
FKUTX Franklin Utilities Fund	7.19%	7.70%	8.66%	6.47%	3.73%	4.96%	9.88%	4.29%	5.83%	3.55%	2.76%	6.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BACAX and FKUTX in my portfolio?

BACAX and FKUTX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BACAX or FKUTX?

BACAX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to FKUTX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BACAX dropped -78.88% vs FKUTX's -43.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BACAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.