BABO vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BABO (YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BABO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. BABO is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, BABO returned 8.62% vs 4.57% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. BABO charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

BABO vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABO achieves a -12.48% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.70% return.

BABO

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -4.06%
• YTD: -12.48%
• 6M: -16.80%
• 1Y: 8.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 4.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABO vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF	-12.48%	7.20%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.70%	2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BABO and RBIL is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	-0.11

Return for Risk

BABO vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABO

BABO Risk / Return Rank: 12
BABO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
BABO Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
BABO Omega Ratio Rank: 13
BABO Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BABO Martin Ratio Rank: 12

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABO vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BABO	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	5.01	-4.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	7.92	-7.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	2.39	-1.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.29	17.00	-16.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.60	70.66	-70.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BABO vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABO Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABO and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BABO	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25	5.01	-4.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	4.28	-3.87

Drawdowns

BABO vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABO drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABO and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BABO	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.37%	-0.50%	-28.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.37%	-0.27%	-29.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.47%	0.00%	-26.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.68%	-0.06%	-13.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.49%	0.07%	+14.42%

Volatility

BABO vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) has a higher volatility of 12.03% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that BABO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BABO	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.03%	0.30%	+11.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.11%	0.79%	+23.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.12%	0.92%	+34.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.77%	1.05%	+35.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.77%	1.05%	+35.72%

BABO vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

BABO vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

BABO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 85.81%, more than RBIL's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF	85.81%	85.50%	20.65%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.60%	3.65%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BABO and RBIL in my portfolio?

BABO and RBIL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BABO or RBIL?

BABO has higher volatility (12.03%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABO dropped -29.37% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

Which ETF is better, BABO or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, BABO leads with 8.62% vs 4.57% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BABO or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, BABO has performed better with a 8.62% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BABO or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BABO or RBIL?

BABO has the higher dividend yield at 85.81%, compared with 4.60% for RBIL.

What is the main difference between BABO and RBIL?

BABO is categorized as Derivative Income, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BABO and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.