PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABO vs. PBP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BABO vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BABO vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BABO
YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF
-12.67%46.84%-0.08%
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
-1.04%8.49%13.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABO achieves a -12.67% return, which is significantly lower than PBP's -1.04% return.


BABO

1D
2.67%
1M
-10.26%
YTD
-12.67%
6M
-23.73%
1Y
-6.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBP

1D
2.04%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
-1.04%
6M
5.76%
1Y
11.29%
3Y*
10.74%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
6.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BABO vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BABO vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABO
BABO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BABO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABO Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BABO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABO Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

PBP
PBP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABO vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BABOPBPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.18

0.80

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.00

1.27

-1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.25

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

1.12

-1.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.52

6.40

-6.92

BABO vs. PBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABO Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the PBP Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABO and PBP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BABOPBPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

0.80

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.32

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between BABO and PBP is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BABO vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

BABO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.67%, more than PBP's 11.63% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BABO
YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF
87.67%85.50%20.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
11.63%11.12%9.36%3.35%1.33%6.21%1.41%5.04%2.59%10.86%2.56%6.19%

Drawdowns

BABO vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABO drawdown since its inception was -29.26%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABO and PBP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BABOPBPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.26%

-43.43%

+14.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.85%

-10.20%

-18.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.64%

-3.29%

-23.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.54%

-6.75%

-5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.93%

1.79%

+11.14%

Volatility

BABO vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) has a higher volatility of 10.87% compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) at 4.09%. This indicates that BABO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BABOPBPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.87%

4.09%

+6.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.93%

5.97%

+18.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.51%

14.26%

+23.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.96%

11.95%

+25.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.96%

13.69%

+23.27%