BABI.L vs. JEPE.L
BABI.L (IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP) and JEPE.L (JPMorgan Europe Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BABI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPE.L.
Performance
BABI.L vs. JEPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BABI.L is traded in USD, while JEPE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the JEPE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
BABI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- 6M
- -35.35%
- YTD
- -28.38%
- 1Y
- -24.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPE.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABI.L vs. JEPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BABI.L IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP | -29.52% |
JEPE.L JPMorgan Europe Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABI.L and JEPE.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2026 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABI.L vs. JEPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
BABI.L
JEPE.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BABI.L vs. JEPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L) and JPMorgan Europe Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (JEPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABI.L | JEPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABI.L vs. JEPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABI.L drawdown since its inception was -59.96%, which is greater than JEPE.L's maximum drawdown of -10.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABI.L and JEPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABI.L | JEPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.96% | -10.49% | -49.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.55% | -1.19% | -53.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.76% | -3.13% | -25.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.92% | — | — |
Volatility
BABI.L vs. JEPE.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABI.L | JEPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.55% | 15.67% | +39.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9,398.92% | 15.67% | +9,383.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9,398.92% | 15.67% | +9,383.25% |
BABI.L vs. JEPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPE.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABI.L vs. JEPE.L - Dividend Comparison
BABI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 65.17%, more than JEPE.L's 3.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BABI.L IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP | 65.17% | 6.93% |
JEPE.L JPMorgan Europe Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 3.64% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABI.L and JEPE.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JEPE.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEPE.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BABI.L.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BABI.L and 0.35% for JEPE.L.
Find the right allocation for BABI.L and JEPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer