BABA vs. NIO
BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) and NIO (NIO Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — BABA in Internet Retail, NIO in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 5 years, BABA returned -9.37%/yr vs -32.79%/yr for NIO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BABA vs. NIO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -13.21% return, which is significantly lower than NIO's 12.75% return.
BABA
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -13.21%
- 6M
- -19.53%
- 1Y
- 12.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.70%
- 5Y*
- -9.37%
- 10Y*
- 5.74%
NIO
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 6M
- 20.04%
- 1Y
- 62.89%
- 3Y*
- -8.72%
- 5Y*
- -32.79%
- 10Y*
- —
BABA vs. NIO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -13.21% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -15.11% |
NIO NIO Inc. | 12.75% | 16.97% | -51.93% | -6.97% | -69.22% | -35.00% | 1,112.44% | -36.89% | -3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABA and NIO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018 | 0.49 |
The correlation between BABA and NIO shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BABA:
$307.20B
NIO:
$14.27B
BABA:
$33.90
NIO:
-$3.74
BABA:
0.38
NIO:
0.14
BABA:
0.29
NIO:
3.29
BABA:
$811.51B
NIO:
$100.51B
BABA:
$332.88B
NIO:
$15.77B
BABA:
$112.44B
NIO:
-$7.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABA vs. NIO — Risk / Return Rank
BABA
NIO
BABA vs. NIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and NIO Inc. (NIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BABA | NIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.20 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 1.45 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.67 | 2.60 | -1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BABA | NIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | 1.00 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | -0.46 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | -0.02 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
BABA vs. NIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, smaller than the maximum NIO drawdown of -95.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and NIO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABA | NIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.09% | -95.00% | +14.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.77% | -43.73% | +6.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.77% | -79.69% | +42.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.48% | -94.10% | +21.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.76% | -90.85% | +33.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.51% | -67.85% | +30.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.62% | 24.25% | -5.63% |
Volatility
BABA vs. NIO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is 14.74%, while NIO Inc. (NIO) has a volatility of 18.85%. This indicates that BABA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABA | NIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.74% | 18.85% | -4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.96% | 41.10% | -12.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.68% | 62.97% | -19.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.36% | 71.68% | -20.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.38% | 86.72% | -43.34% |
Dividends
BABA vs. NIO - Dividend Comparison
BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, while NIO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 1.57% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% |
NIO NIO Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BABA vs. NIO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and NIO Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BABA vs. NIO - Profitability Comparison
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
NIO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.86B and revenue of 25.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
NIO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported an operating income of -308.81M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.2%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
NIO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported a net income of -496.01M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BABA and NIO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NIO has higher volatility (18.85%) compared to BABA (14.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABA dropped -80.09% vs NIO's -95.00%.
NIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BABA and NIO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer