PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABA vs. VTIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BABA vs. VTIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -13.21% return, which is significantly lower than VTIP's 2.05% return. Over the past 10 years, BABA has outperformed VTIP with an annualized return of 5.74%, while VTIP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.14% annualized return.


BABA

1D
-2.76%
1M
-4.55%
YTD
-13.21%
6M
-19.53%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
-9.37%
10Y*
5.74%

VTIP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.04%
YTD
2.05%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
3.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABA vs. VTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-13.21%75.80%11.77%-10.83%-25.84%-48.96%9.73%54.74%-20.51%96.37%
VTIP
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
2.05%6.07%4.74%4.62%-2.94%5.36%4.95%4.86%0.56%0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BABA and VTIP is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2014

-0.01

The correlation between BABA and VTIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BABA vs. VTIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABA
BABA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VTIP
VTIP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABA vs. VTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BABAVTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.67

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

6.75

-6.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.67

26.06

-25.39

BABA vs. VTIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABA Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the VTIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABA and VTIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BABAVTIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

3.15

-2.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

1.22

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

1.15

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.89

-0.82

Drawdowns

BABA vs. VTIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, which is greater than VTIP's maximum drawdown of -6.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and VTIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BABAVTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.09%

-6.27%

-73.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.77%

-0.70%

-36.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.77%

-0.98%

-35.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.48%

-5.50%

-66.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.09%

-6.27%

-73.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.76%

-0.02%

-57.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.51%

-1.04%

-36.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.62%

0.18%

+18.44%

Volatility

BABA vs. VTIP - Volatility Comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) at 0.43%. This indicates that BABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BABAVTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.74%

0.43%

+14.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.96%

1.02%

+27.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.68%

1.50%

+42.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.36%

2.77%

+48.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.38%

2.74%

+40.64%

Dividends

BABA vs. VTIP - Dividend Comparison

BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than VTIP's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
1.57%1.36%1.96%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTIP
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
3.58%3.81%2.70%2.86%6.84%4.68%1.20%1.95%2.45%1.52%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


BABA and VTIP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BABA has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to VTIP (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABA dropped -80.09% vs VTIP's -6.27%.

VTIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BABA and VTIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer