PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABA vs. TRX-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BABA vs. TRX-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Tronix (TRX-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -22.32% return, which is significantly lower than TRX-USD's 11.24% return.


BABA

1D
0.12%
1M
-19.32%
YTD
-22.32%
6M
-26.87%
1Y
0.87%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
-10.74%
10Y*
4.42%

TRX-USD

1D
0.23%
1M
-10.66%
YTD
11.24%
6M
16.57%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
64.55%
5Y*
34.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABA vs. TRX-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-22.32%75.80%11.77%-10.83%-25.84%-48.96%9.73%54.74%-20.51%-0.94%
TRX-USD
Tronix
11.24%11.86%135.87%97.75%-27.86%180.88%102.08%-29.71%-57.23%2,056.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BABA and TRX-USD is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2017

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BABA vs. TRX-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABA
BABA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

TRX-USD
TRX-USD Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TRX-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRX-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRX-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TRX-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRX-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABA vs. TRX-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Tronix (TRX-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BABATRX-USDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.11

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

0.64

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.12

1.14

-1.26

BABA vs. TRX-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABA Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the TRX-USD Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABA and TRX-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BABA vs. TRX-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, smaller than the maximum TRX-USD drawdown of -95.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and TRX-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BABATRX-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.09%

-95.89%

+15.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.94%

-26.58%

-13.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.94%

-50.98%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.48%

-59.60%

-12.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.20%

-27.00%

-35.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.56%

-62.47%

+24.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.58%

13.82%

+5.76%

Volatility

BABA vs. TRX-USD - Volatility Comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a higher volatility of 10.07% compared to Tronix (TRX-USD) at 8.57%. This indicates that BABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRX-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BABATRX-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.07%

8.57%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.24%

17.91%

+11.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.83%

23.82%

+20.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.40%

58.42%

-7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.40%

110.20%

-66.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


BABA and TRX-USD have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BABA has higher volatility (10.07%) compared to TRX-USD (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABA dropped -80.09% vs TRX-USD's -95.89%.

TRX-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BABA and TRX-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer