PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tronix (TRX-USD) and Stellar (XLM-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRX-USD
Tronix
10.97%11.86%135.87%97.75%-27.86%180.88%102.08%-29.71%-57.23%2,118.51%
XLM-USD
Stellar
-18.72%-39.55%157.40%81.66%-73.35%108.68%184.76%-60.36%-68.37%2,099.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRX-USD achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly higher than XLM-USD's -18.72% return.


TRX-USD

1D
-0.08%
1M
12.41%
YTD
10.97%
6M
-8.04%
1Y
34.83%
3Y*
68.64%
5Y*
25.48%
10Y*

XLM-USD

1D
-3.63%
1M
7.63%
YTD
-18.72%
6M
-60.10%
1Y
-36.80%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
-16.77%
10Y*
53.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRX-USD
TRX-USD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TRX-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRX-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRX-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TRX-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRX-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

XLM-USD
XLM-USD Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tronix (TRX-USD) and Stellar (XLM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRX-USDXLM-USDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

-0.49

+1.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

-0.37

+2.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.97

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

-1.11

+1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.03

-1.69

+1.73

TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRX-USD Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRX-USD and XLM-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRX-USDXLM-USDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

-0.49

+1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

-0.18

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.32

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between TRX-USD and XLM-USD is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRX-USD drawdown since its inception was -95.89%, roughly equal to the maximum XLM-USD drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRX-USD and XLM-USD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TRX-USDXLM-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.89%

-96.21%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.58%

-70.49%

+43.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.54%

-90.35%

+20.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.17%

-81.50%

+54.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-72.00%

+8.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.32%

44.31%

-26.99%

Volatility

TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tronix (TRX-USD) is 7.37%, while Stellar (XLM-USD) has a volatility of 15.66%. This indicates that TRX-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TRX-USDXLM-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

15.66%

-8.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.13%

49.47%

-29.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.62%

62.78%

-37.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.41%

77.57%

-12.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

111.44%

112.23%

-0.79%