PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tronix (TRX-USD) and Stellar (XLM-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRX-USD achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly higher than XLM-USD's -1.95% return.


TRX-USD

1D
-1.47%
1M
-9.96%
YTD
15.74%
6M
16.06%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
65.77%
5Y*
37.84%
10Y*

XLM-USD

1D
-2.90%
1M
33.52%
YTD
-1.95%
6M
-9.35%
1Y
-19.96%
3Y*
29.58%
5Y*
-6.05%
10Y*
59.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRX-USD
Tronix
15.74%11.86%135.87%97.75%-27.86%180.88%102.08%-29.71%-57.23%2,056.30%
XLM-USD
Stellar
-1.95%-39.55%157.40%81.66%-73.35%108.68%184.76%-60.36%-68.37%1,991.09%

Correlation

The correlation between TRX-USD and XLM-USD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2017

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between TRX-USD and XLM-USD has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRX-USD
TRX-USD Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TRX-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRX-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRX-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TRX-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRX-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

XLM-USD
XLM-USD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tronix (TRX-USD) and Stellar (XLM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRX-USDXLM-USDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.02

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

-0.28

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.35

-0.39

+1.74

TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRX-USD Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRX-USD and XLM-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRX-USD drawdown since its inception was -95.89%, roughly equal to the maximum XLM-USD drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRX-USD and XLM-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRX-USDXLM-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.89%

-96.21%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.58%

-71.19%

+44.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.98%

-74.37%

+23.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.60%

-83.25%

+23.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.04%

-77.68%

+53.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.35%

-72.15%

+9.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.47%

40.82%

-31.35%

Volatility

TRX-USD vs. XLM-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tronix (TRX-USD) is 9.06%, while Stellar (XLM-USD) has a volatility of 45.39%. This indicates that TRX-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRX-USDXLM-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.06%

45.39%

-36.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.92%

60.60%

-42.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.83%

71.58%

-47.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.51%

74.40%

-16.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

110.03%

112.82%

-2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRX-USD and XLM-USD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLM-USD has higher volatility (45.39%) compared to TRX-USD (9.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRX-USD dropped -95.89% vs XLM-USD's -96.21%.

TRX-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRX-USD and XLM-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer