PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABA vs. QTOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BABA vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -22.32% return, which is significantly lower than QTOP's 18.39% return.


BABA

1D
0.12%
1M
-14.13%
YTD
-22.32%
6M
-26.87%
1Y
0.87%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
-10.74%
10Y*
4.42%

QTOP

1D
0.53%
1M
0.35%
YTD
18.39%
6M
19.40%
1Y
41.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABA vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-22.32%75.80%-13.48%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
18.39%22.19%6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BABA and QTOP is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BABA vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABA
BABA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABA vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BABAQTOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.37

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

3.09

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.12

11.09

-11.21

BABA vs. QTOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABA Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the QTOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABA and QTOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BABA vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, which is greater than QTOP's maximum drawdown of -23.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and QTOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BABAQTOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.09%

-23.28%

-56.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.94%

-12.88%

-27.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.20%

-3.73%

-58.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.56%

-3.82%

-33.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.58%

3.59%

+15.99%

Volatility

BABA vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a higher volatility of 10.07% compared to iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) at 7.92%. This indicates that BABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BABAQTOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.07%

7.92%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.24%

15.13%

+14.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.83%

18.65%

+25.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.40%

23.12%

+28.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.40%

23.12%

+20.28%

Dividends

BABA vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison

BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than QTOP's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.93%1.36%1.96%1.29%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
0.33%0.38%0.11%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BABA and QTOP have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BABA has higher volatility (10.07%) compared to QTOP (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABA dropped -80.09% vs QTOP's -23.28%.

QTOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BABA and QTOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer