PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABA vs. NGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BABA vs. NGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and New Gold Inc. (NGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BABA

1D
0.12%
1M
-19.32%
YTD
-22.32%
6M
-26.87%
1Y
0.87%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
-10.74%
10Y*
4.42%

NGD

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABA vs. NGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-22.32%75.80%11.77%-10.83%-25.84%-48.96%9.73%54.74%-20.51%96.37%
NGD
New Gold Inc.
4.25%251.21%69.86%48.98%-34.67%-31.51%148.86%16.28%-77.00%-6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BABA and NGD is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014

0.12

Fundamentals

EPS

BABA:

CN¥33.90

NGD:

$1.61

PE Ratio

BABA:

22.55

NGD:

5.64

PEG Ratio

BABA:

1.01

NGD:

0.01

PS Ratio

BABA:

2.26

NGD:

3.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

BABA:

CN¥811.51B

NGD:

$1.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BABA:

CN¥332.88B

NGD:

$758.26M

EBITDA (TTM)

BABA:

CN¥112.44B

NGD:

$1.19B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BABA vs. NGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABA
BABA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

NGD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABA vs. NGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and New Gold Inc. (NGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BABANGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.12

BABA vs. NGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BABA vs. NGD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BABANGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.58%

Volatility

BABA vs. NGD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BABANGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.40%

Dividends

BABA vs. NGD - Dividend Comparison

BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while NGD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.93%1.36%1.96%1.29%
NGD
New Gold Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BABA vs. NGD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and New Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B300.00B20222023202420252026
35.15B
496.10M
(BABA) Total Revenue
(NGD) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BABA values in CNY, NGD values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BABA and NGD have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BABA and NGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer